Backup schedule should be spread over the day

Bug #1154920 reported by Sidnei da Silva
18
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Déjà Dup
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
deja-dup (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Precise
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Quantal
Won't Fix
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Impact]
On the Ubuntu One File Storage API we see a big spike in the number of API requests at 00:00Z, daily. Pretty much all of the requests at that time come from Deja Dup/Duplicity.

This makes it more likely that users will see errors from Ubuntu One being overloaded, like in bug 882699.

[Fix]
Due to a bug, we always were backing up at midnight UTC, rather than midnight local time. While fixing that, I also put in code to randomly choose a time between 2 and 4 AM (local time), rather than midnight.

[Test Case]
* Enable daily automatic backups
* Change your time zone so that it is 2AM
* Wait two hours. Deja Dup should start backing up within those two hours.

[Regression Potential]
* The only code changed was the automatic scheduler. So any regressions would be there.

Haw Loeung (hloeung)
tags: added: canonical-webops-u1
Revision history for this message
Alexander List (alexlist) wrote :

I suggest some random + exponential backoff, like in CSMA/CD or CSMA/CA:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_backoff

Revision history for this message
Alexander List (alexlist) wrote :

https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/479191 is related: feature request for detailed scheduling.

The scheduler could default to random backup, and allow overriding by the user.

Revision history for this message
Sidnei da Silva (sidnei) wrote :

Looks like the problem is fairly isolated in common/CommonUtils.vala:

in next_run_date(), it always returns the return of most_recent_scheduled_date(), or if comparing to last_run returns a negative timespan, then it adds the configured period.

Turns out that most_recent_scheduled date always returns a DateTime at 00:00Z due to the way it's computed.

Michael Terry (mterry)
Changed in deja-dup:
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Michael Terry (mterry) wrote :

Uploaded to precise. Will subscribe ubuntu-sru. If they like it, I can upload to quantal too.

description: updated
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package deja-dup - 26.0-0ubuntu1

---------------
deja-dup (26.0-0ubuntu1) raring; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
    - Only use the GNOME Shell interface when actually in GNOME Shell,
      not something that is merely similar, like the Cinnamon shell
      (LP: #1155929)
    - When testing a restore, also use a temporary directory that is
      on the same partition as the include files (LP: #1159749)
    - Spread default backup time around a bit, from always starting at
      midnight UTC to starting between 2 and 4 AM local time
      (LP: #1154920)
    - Use more-aggressively-idle modes for ionice and nice if available
 -- Michael Terry <email address hidden> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:01:53 -0400

Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Sidnei, or anyone else affected,

Accepted deja-dup into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/22.0-0ubuntu4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu Precise):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu Quantal):
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
Sidnei da Silva (sidnei) wrote :

Seems to fix the problem as expected.

tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Sidnei da Silva (sidnei) wrote :

Tested 22.0-0ubuntu4 on precise by enabling -proposed.

Revision history for this message
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote : Update Released

The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package deja-dup - 22.0-0ubuntu4

---------------
deja-dup (22.0-0ubuntu4) precise-proposed; urgency=low

  * debian/patches/spread-backup-epoch.patch:
    - Don't always start backup times from midnight UTC. Rather, start
      between 2-4 AM local time. LP: #1154920
 -- Michael Terry <email address hidden> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:01:05 -0400

Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu Precise):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

quantal has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the quantal task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".

Changed in deja-dup (Ubuntu Quantal):
status: Triaged → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.