[FFe] needs-packaging: qtwebsockets-opensource-src

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:36:01AM -0000, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> You have been subscribed to a public bug by Dmitry Shachnev (mitya57):
>
> It was suggested on ubuntu-devel that it would be nice to have qtwebsockets module in Utopic:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2014-September/038480.html
>
> The packaging is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
> kde/qt/qtwebsockets.git — acceptable for Ubuntu with minor changes (like
> building against qtbase 5.3.0, not 5.3.1)

Sounds like the BD version could be relaxed?

> It was part of Qt 5.3 upstream release, but it was just recently
> accepted to Debian.

I think this is a good idea, go ahead. If this isn't a sync, please find
an AA who will review before you upload (Scott K?).

 status triaged
 importance low

Cheers,

--
Iain Lane [ <email address hidden> ]
Debian Developer [ <email address hidden> ]
Ubuntu Developer [ <email address hidden> ]

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 08:15:27 Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:36:01AM -0000, Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> > You have been subscribed to a public bug by Dmitry Shachnev (mitya57):
> >
> > It was suggested on ubuntu-devel that it would be nice to have
> > qtwebsockets module in Utopic:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2014-September/038480.html
> >
> > The packaging is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-> > kde/qt/qtwebsockets.git — acceptable for Ubuntu with minor changes (like
> > building against qtbase 5.3.0, not 5.3.1)
>
> Sounds like the BD version could be relaxed?
>
> > It was part of Qt 5.3 upstream release, but it was just recently
> > accepted to Debian.
>
> I think this is a good idea, go ahead. If this isn't a sync, please find
> an AA who will review before you upload (Scott K?).

I can review it on Saturday if it's uploaded before then.

Scott: What I want to upload is 5.3.1 package from Debian with version downgraded to 5.3.0 (like done in qtxmlpatterns and qtscript). Can I go ahead and put it to NEW?

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:35:17 you wrote:
> Scott: What I want to upload is 5.3.1 package from Debian with version
> downgraded to 5.3.0 (like done in qtxmlpatterns and qtscript). Can I go
> ahead and put it to NEW?

As long as you've tested it and it works.

>> The packaging is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
>> kde/qt/qtwebsockets.git — acceptable for Ubuntu with minor changes (like
>> building against qtbase 5.3.0, not 5.3.1)
> Sounds like the BD version could be relaxed?

The BD:s need to be always bumped, or in this case lowered, to match the current qtbase/qtdeclarative abi version. Additionally what Dmitry explained about downgrading the (reported) version to match the qtbase version is what's needed since Qt makes certain version number checks.

Tested (as in: builds on i386 and amd64, installs, needed files are present, the testsuite passes), and uploaded.

Also included Timo's change to build qml bindings.

This bug was fixed in the package qtwebsockets-opensource-src - 5.3.1-1ubuntu1

---------------
qtwebsockets-opensource-src (5.3.1-1ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=medium

  [ Dmitry Shachnev ]
  * Initial upload to Ubuntu, based on Debian packaging git
    (LP: #1370927).
  * Build against Qt 5.3.0.
  * Set the version to 3.5.0 to prevent other packages from
    failing to build (because of a version mix).
  * Use correct exception syntax in debian/copyright.

  [ Timo Jyrinki ]
  * Add Qt Declarative build dependency and build the QML module
 -- Dmitry Shachnev <email address hidden> Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:16:02 +0400