bcm43xx Driver only works @ 11Mb/s

Bug #36525 reported by trubblelmaker
18
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)
Expired
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

this driver only works if you use the command
sudo iwconfig eth1 rate 11M

I'd like to be like everyone else and use more than 11Mb/s

specifically I have a bcm4318 card but I've heared mutliple reports as seen here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=114922

Revision history for this message
foxy123 (foxy) wrote :

I've got the same problem with bcm4606 driver. It works only with 11mb/s.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Garrett (mjg59) wrote :

There's currently no real support for setting the transmission power, so as you increase the speed, reliability decreases. It's unlikely that this will be improved in time for dapper - indeed, we'll be setting the default speed to 11MBit.

Revision history for this message
trubblelmaker (matt-andruff) wrote :

so in your opinion is better to stickit out at 11Mb/s or switch back to ndiswrapper,
which is faster?

How can I lend assistance to help "speed up" the process?

Revision history for this message
Ivan Matveich (ivan-matveich) wrote : rate 54M works for me w/ ibook g4 12"

/etc/network/interfaces stanza:

auto wireless
iface wireless inet static
        address 192.168.2.2
        netmask 255.255.255.0
        gateway 192.168.2.1
        dns-nameservers 192.168.1.1
        wireless-essid TV
        wireless-rate 54M
        wireless-channel 10
        up iwlist scan

stanza for access point (atheros card):

auto wireless
iface wireless inet static
        address 192.168.2.1
        netmask 255.255.255.0
        wireless-essid TV
        wireless-mode Master
        wireless-rate 54M
        wireless-channel 10
        pre-up iwpriv wireless mode 3

Revision history for this message
trubblelmaker (matt-andruff) wrote :

sorry atheros isn't bcm4306 or bcm4318 and isn't actually related to bcm43xx driver at all, so thanks for the input but your on a different chipset, with your own driver

Revision history for this message
Sitsofe Wheeler (sitsofe) wrote :

trubblelmaker:
Your best bet is to try and work with the upstream developers (http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ ) to debug the drivers they are making and push newly stablised drivers into the mainstream kernel where they will be picked up by the distros.

Revision history for this message
Ivan Matveich (ivan-matveich) wrote :

trubblelmaker,

The ibook's wireless chipset is indeed a bcm4306; the access point is atheros.

So it's worth a shot to try that configuration.

Matt Zimmerman (mdz)
Changed in linux-source-2.6.15:
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
trubblelmaker (matt-andruff) wrote :

I'll give the static config a shot, won't work for me at school but I let you know how it goes at home.

Revision history for this message
Sitsofe Wheeler (sitsofe) wrote :

trubblelmaker:

Is this any better in a 2.6.15-23 kernel?

Revision history for this message
Sitsofe Wheeler (sitsofe) wrote :

Setting to needsinfo pending reply from trubblelmaker.

Changed in linux-source-2.6.15:
status: Confirmed → Needs Info
Revision history for this message
trubblelmaker (matt-andruff) wrote :

impoved it now works upto 36Mb/s although it seems to be a little slow, I will use it for a little while and make sure it continues to run properly, still can't get it to work @ 48Mb/s or 54Mb/s.

Revision history for this message
trubblelmaker (matt-andruff) wrote :

ok so my dmesg now get filled with variations of these error/info messages:

[4299514.954000] ieee80211: eth1: IEEE80211_ASSOC_REQ received
[4299616.027000] SoftMAC: Authentication response received from 00:0e:35:8b:c8:2e but no queue item exists.
[4299616.029000] SoftMAC: Authentication response received from 00:0f:34:ef:e6:70 but no queue item exists.
[4299616.030000] ieee80211: eth1: IEEE80211_ASSOC_REQ received
[4299675.755000] SoftMAC: Received deauthentication packet from 00:0f:34:c1:89:00, but that network is unknown.

on the upside it doesn't fail and it often goes faster, so we're getting real close but still error messages, I"m happy to test anything else you have upyour sleave and will continue to monitor and test it for you.

Kees Cook (kees)
Changed in linux-source-2.6.15:
importance: Medium → Low
status: Needs Info → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Thomas Hotz (thotz-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

This Ubuntu version is not supported any more. Should we close this bug?

Changed in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.