libticalcs FTBFS: missing libtifiles-dev
Bug #507740 reported by
Kamal Mostafa
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libticalcs (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Emmet Hikory |
Bug Description
E: Couldn't find package libtifiles-dev
But the actual problem is that Ubuntu's renamed package "libtifiles2" in Lucid blocks Debian package "libtifiles" from uploading. Likewise, Ubuntu's renamed "libticalcs2" will be in conflict with Debian's "libticalcs". The plan for Lucid is to merge Lucid's "libtifiles2" and "libticalcs2" into "libtifiles" and "libticalcs" (respectively) and then remove the "2" packages.
Related branches
lp:~kamalmostafa/ubuntu/lucid/libticalcs/merge-507740
- Ubuntu branches: Pending requested
-
Diff: 1621 lines (+1332/-44)18 files modifiedChangeLog (+4/-1)
debian/changelog (+15/-0)
debian/control (+5/-3)
debian/libticalcs-dev.doc-base (+10/-0)
po/fr.po (+15/-21)
po/libticalcs2.pot (+3/-3)
src/cmd89.c (+2/-2)
src/error.c (+3/-3)
src/rom73.h (+100/-1)
src/rom82.h (+106/-1)
src/rom83.h (+192/-1)
src/rom83p.h (+98/-1)
src/rom85.h (+97/-1)
src/rom86.h (+97/-1)
src/rom89.h (+194/-1)
src/rom89t.h (+229/-1)
src/rom92f2.h (+160/-1)
src/ticalcs.h (+2/-2)
Changed in libticalcs (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Kamal Mostafa (kamalmostafa) |
status: | New → In Progress |
description: | updated |
Changed in libticalcs (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Emmet Hikory (persia) |
status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
To post a comment you must log in.
Side note: What about libticables2? Does it need the same "merge and drop the 2" treatment? (libticalcs-dev depends on libticables2-dev)