photoprint crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

Bug #571701 reported by Mike A. Kuznetsov
22
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
photoprint (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: photoprint

photoprint segfaults while try to start printing

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: photoprint 0.4.1-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Apr 29 17:14:09 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/photoprint
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Release Candidate i386 (20100419.1)
ProcCmdline: photoprint
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=ru_RU.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x80af5d2: cmpb $0x70,(%eax)
 PC (0x080af5d2) ok
 source "$0x70" ok
 destination "(%eax)" (0x00000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: photoprint
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID ()
Title: photoprint crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Mike A. Kuznetsov (mike4gg) wrote :
visibility: private → public
Changed in photoprint (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 PrintOutput::GetConsumer (this=0xbf8c7ef0) at printoutput.cpp:90
 GPrinter::Print (this=0xbf8c7f00, src=0x967f380, xpos=0,
 Layout::Print (this=0x93492f0, p=0xbf8c7080)
 file_print (action=0x93af568, ob=0x956a818)
 IA__g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (closure=0x9580400,

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt
Changed in photoprint (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
Revision history for this message
Niall Creech (sevenmachines-deactivatedaccount) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Michael Mior (michaelmior) wrote :

This is fixed in the pre-release of version 0.4.2. The attached patch solves the problem, although I suspect not in a fully "correct" manner since it seems to be done differently in 0.4.2.

tags: added: patch
Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote :

This version is outdated and no more supported

Changed in photoprint (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.