Ubuntu
flashplugin-nonfree package

Fix description after 10.1.53.64ubuntu2 update

Bug #614912 reported by Micah Gersten
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
One Hundred Papercuts
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree

There were a few problems with the description that was updated in bug #613259. First, the product is called Adobe Flash Player, so that needs to remain in the description. Second, the Mozilla browsers are no longer referenced with Mozilla preceding them.

Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

I'd like to get 2 ACKs from either the papercutters or the review team before proposing the merge/upload of this diff. Here's the direct link to the diff:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~micahg/ubuntu/maverick/flashplugin-nonfree/fix-bug614912/revision/59

Changed in flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
Revision history for this message
Vish (vish) wrote :

Just for reference , this was the old description:
 Description: Adobe Flash Player plugin installer
- This package will download the Flash Player from the net. It is a
- Netscape/Mozilla type plugin. Any browser based on Netscape or Mozilla can
- use the Flash plugin. This package currently supports the following browsers:
- Mozilla, Mozilla-Firefox, Firefox, Iceweasel, and Iceape. Also Galeon and
- Epiphany can use the Flash plugin. Konqueror can also use the Flash plugin if
- konqueror-nsplugins is installed.

Note , that the short description mentions Adobe , but not the long description. The Adobe reference wasnt actually dropped.
It never was there.
Was there a reason it dint exist earlier? Or are we just making the description more accurate now?

If there was no reason it was left out earlier , the new description sounds OK.

Changed in hundredpapercuts:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :

Attaching a debdiff rather than a UDD merge since UDD branch is out of date

Revision history for this message
Stefano Rivera (stefanor) wrote :

Micah: Are you still waiting for another ack? Or is this ready for upload?

Revision history for this message
Vish (vish) wrote :

Copy-pasting from my comment #2:
"Was there a reason it dint exist earlier? Or are we just making the description more accurate now?

If there was no reason it was left out earlier , the new description sounds OK."

We dont need 2papercut task to fix the same bug! Closing papercut task.

Changed in hundredpapercuts:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote : Re: [Bug 614912] Re: Fix description after 10.1.53.64ubuntu2 update

 Stefano, if you like it, go ahead and upload.

On 08/23/2010 05:32 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Micah: Are you still waiting for another ack? Or is this ready for
> upload?
>

Stefano Rivera (stefanor)
Changed in flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package flashplugin-nonfree - 10.1.82.76ubuntu2

---------------
flashplugin-nonfree (10.1.82.76ubuntu2) maverick; urgency=low

  * debian/control: Fix description after 10.1.53.64ubuntu2 update (LP: #614912)
    - Make sure Adobe Flash Player is fully referenced in the description
    - Mozilla browsers no longer are referenced by the Mozilla prefix
 -- Micah Gersten <email address hidden> Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:14:03 +0200

Changed in flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.