Please provide a copy of the license with the source

Bug #648200 reported by Elad Alfassa
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Lucid
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Maverick
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnome-exe-thumbnailer

I'm packaging gnome-exe-thumbnailer for Fedora, and on the package review i was told that i should include the license in the package, and that i should ask upstream to include license files in next release.

without the license files, this package would not get into Fedora.

Revision history for this message
Elad Alfassa (elad661) wrote :

i forgot the link of the package review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636819

Revision history for this message
Jan Nekvasil (jan-nekvasil) wrote :

As the main author of current gnome-exe-thumbnailer, I didn't thought about the licence yet, but I supposed it should be GPLv3 all the time. Only a few lines of original code which I found somewhere on ubuntuforums.org (specifically the main part of that awk voodoo) now remains in 0.6-0ubuntu1.

Scott Ritchie is reviewing the brand new, yet unreleased version at this moment, which came with lot of bugfixes and new features as "Vista" icons support and basic .msi files thumbnailing with version number label from extended file properties (more reliable version number from ProductVersion MSI property will came in next version).

I will ask Scott (I suppose he would be reading this anyway) to hold the release for a moment and include the proper license. If You please could wait for that, You would get the license with that release.

Gnome-exe-thumbnailer is my first project that gets packaged, so I'm not too much experienced with things like that yet.

Thanks for Your understanding

Jan

Revision history for this message
Jan Nekvasil (jan-nekvasil) wrote :

I just checked the package and found /usr/share/doc/gnome-exe-thumbnailer/copyright. So the license exits and is LGPL 2.1 (I'm pretty fine with that). Can this be used for packaging in Fedora?

Revision history for this message
Jan Nekvasil (jan-nekvasil) wrote :

I mean exists, not exits. Still there is a good reason to wait for new version though.

Revision history for this message
Elad Alfassa (elad661) wrote :

a copy of the license itself should be included with the source code, not just it's name.

as mentioned in the copyright file:
"You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
    along with this program."

thank you for your help, i will wait for the new release.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package gnome-exe-thumbnailer - 0.7-0ubuntu1

---------------
gnome-exe-thumbnailer (0.7-0ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low

  * New version (thanks Jan Nekvasil)
    - support Vista icons (LP: #622220)
  * Include copy of LGPL 2.1 (LP: #648200)
  * Put images in /usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-exe-thumbnailer
 -- Scott Ritchie <email address hidden> Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:44:35 -0700

Changed in gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

I suppose this is fixed in maverick.

Changed in gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Ah, maybe not, since the changelog for this is only in the lucid backport.

Changed in gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Fix Released → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Argh, too early, sorry. Comment 6 shows that it's fixed in maverick.

Changed in gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu Maverick):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu Lucid):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Please test proposed package

Accepted gnome-exe-thumbnailer into lucid-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!

Revision history for this message
Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) wrote :

SRU verification for Lucid:
I have reproduced the problem with gnome-exe-thumbnailer 0.2 in lucid and have verified that the version of gnome-exe-thumbnailer 0.7-0ubuntu1~lucid1 in -proposed fixes the issue. The License file LGPL 2.1 is included in the sources og g-e-t 0.7.

Marking as verification-done

tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package gnome-exe-thumbnailer - 0.7-0ubuntu1~lucid1

---------------
gnome-exe-thumbnailer (0.7-0ubuntu1~lucid1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low

  * New version with great looking icons (thanks Jan Nekvasil)
    - support Vista icons (LP: #622220)
  * Include copy of LGPL 2.1 (LP: #648200)
  * Put images in /usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-exe-thumbnailer
 -- Scott Ritchie <email address hidden> Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:40 -0700

Changed in gnome-exe-thumbnailer (Ubuntu Lucid):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.