oo.o (dapper) fails to build per wiki instructions

KarlGoetz schrieb:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: openoffice.org
>
> We have impress crashing often at my work where we are trying to do
> training [1].

this is an already fixed issue.

> When trying to build debugging packages with instructions
> from [2] i get issues similar to [3], but this is on dapper.

the current OOo 2.2.0 packages do build on dapper; we do not support building
the 2.0.4 packages on dapper.

> I was hoping to have debugging packages to run to check whats cuasing impress crashes, but it seems that wont happen.
> I'll try and get some output of the build as it works/fails tomorrow.

I'm closing this report; 2.2.0 backports are available at

deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ dapper-backports/

> Might be this bug [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/61664
> [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash
> [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/10742

closing this report.

Matthias Klose wrote:
> KarlGoetz schrieb:
>
>> Public bug reported:
>>
>> Binary package hint: openoffice.org
>>
>> We have impress crashing often at my work where we are trying to do
>> training [1].
>>
>
> this is an already fixed issue.
>
>
>> When trying to build debugging packages with instructions
>> from [2] i get issues similar to [3], but this is on dapper.
>>
>
> the current OOo 2.2.0 packages do build on dapper; we do not support building
> the 2.0.4 packages on dapper.
>
>
>> I was hoping to have debugging packages to run to check whats cuasing impress crashes, but it seems that wont happen.
>> I'll try and get some output of the build as it works/fails tomorrow.
>>
>
> I'm closing this report; 2.2.0 backports are available at
>
> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ dapper-backports/
>
using a repository that's officially unsupported is the only way to get
a working office suit?
>
>> Might be this bug [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/61664
>> [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash
>> [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/10742
>>
>
> closing this report.
>
>

--
Karl Goetz
User of gNewSense: Free as in Freedom - http://www.gnewsense.org
Australian Ubuntu users team - http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam
User of Debian, The Universal Operating System - http://www.debian.org

KarlGoetz schrieb:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I'm closing this report; 2.2.0 backports are available at
>>
>> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ dapper-backports/
>>
> using a repository that's officially unsupported is the only way to get
> a working office suit?

the *-updates repositories will never see an upstream version bump.

the repository deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ dapper-backports/ 'doesnt work'

Err http://people.ubuntu.com dapper-backports/ Release.gpg
  Connection failed

Err http://people.ubuntu.com dapper-backports/ Packages
  Connection failed

Failed to fetch http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/dapper-backports/Release.gpg Connection failed
Failed to fetch http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/dapper-backports/Packages.gz Connection failed

http://www.ubuntu.com/~doko/ubuntu/ 404's.

Karl,

The machine you attempted to download from apparently didn't have internet access or people.ubuntu.com was temporarily down since your log shows:

Err http://people.ubuntu.com dapper-backports/ Packages
  Connection failed

I tested it now and it does seem to work from my machine.

Thanks,

Chris Cheney

Chris Cheney wrote:
> Karl,
>
> The machine you attempted to download from apparently didn't have
> internet access or people.ubuntu.com was temporarily down since your log
> shows:
>
> Err http://people.ubuntu.com dapper-backports/ Packages
> Connection failed
>
> I tested it now and it does seem to work from my machine.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris Cheney
>
> ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
> Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
>
>

since i filed the bug from the system in question, i doubt i had no net
access.
and no, people.u.c wasnt down, i checked.
as long as the repository is up again.