Nautilus as FTP has no CHMOD ability

Bug #19248 reported by Brian Burger
92
This bug affects 13 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Nautilus
Invalid
Wishlist
gvfs
Fix Released
Wishlist
gvfs (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

When using Hoary's Nautilus to mount server/FTP connections, there is no ability to either read or set
permissions on the remote server.

As well - and far more dangerous - when you create new folders in the remote directories with Nautilus, they are
created with chmod 777 - read/write/execute permissions for the entire world.

I have to use gFTP to change permissions for now, and that has to be the worst ftp client every built - but
that's for another bug report...

Revision history for this message
Corey Burger (corey.burger) wrote :

The permission reading/changing issue already exists upstream:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309700
The folder creation one has just been filed as:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311706

Revision history for this message
Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

upstream have a suggested patch - hope they get it in soon.

Revision history for this message
Paco Avila (monkiki) wrote :

This is an horrible bug, any progress on it?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Paco, could you argue on why the bug is "horrible" for you? Do you think that changing mode of a ftp file is a common user request?

Revision history for this message
Brian Burger (bburger) wrote :

Permissions are a pretty basic part of file handling, I'd think.

Case in point: One server I maintain a website on has very restrictive permissions by default, which are applied to every file that gets uploaded - only viewable by owner. (700, I guess?) To get the actual website working, I have to change perms on every file I upload there. This means I can't use Nautilus as it stands now for managing this website.

I haven't yet tried Nautilus in Dapper Beta - does anyone know if this has been fixed in Gnome 2.14?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

It has not been fixed yet but I'll play with patch from http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2006-March/msg00107.html probably before dapper and backport it if upstream commits it to CVS or is fine with it

Revision history for this message
Paco Avila (monkiki) wrote :

I don't know if a common user want to change a remote file permissions, but I work with Ubuntu every day and I need this feature. Yes, I can use gftp but I think this is a very important missing feature: if I use Nautilus for my local files why can't use Nautilus for my remote files?

Konqueror can manage remote file permissions for years :(

Revision history for this message
Richard Brooklyn (rbrooklyn) wrote :

I feel this bug is being under-estimated.

Yes, you could argue that the 'average user' (if such a thing exists) such doesn't care about permissions... Then again, the 'average user' (sorry, but I hate that phrase) wouldn't be using FTP in the first place.

I feel that anyone who is using FTP will certinally care about what permissions the files will have.

I do strongly feel this is a very important bug which must be fixed before Dapper comes out. Permissions are an essential part of FTP, much like copy and paste on the desktop; not everyone will use it, but it looks silly if it can't be used.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the bug is not under-estimated but you probably under-estimate the numbers of bugs sent for the number of people triaging and fixing theme. The desktop list get hundreds of bug mails a day and there is only some people replying to all of them. We have to prioritize work. That's the same for upstream, there 3-4 people only working on that component which according to the number of things to do is not a lot. If you want to make sure that's fixed better helping fixing or or sending a patch than trying to blame overworked people to not fix your small bug right now

Simon Law (sfllaw)
Changed in nautilus:
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Would be nice to fix for dapper. Was supposed to be fixed with http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2006-March/msg00107.html upstream which has been applied for dapper but the change works fine on sftp but not on ftp (yet)

Changed in nautilus:
assignee: seb128 → desktop-bugs
Revision history for this message
KenSentMe (jeroen-vandenieuwenhof) wrote :

Dapper has been released, but i don't think this bug is solved yet. The problem still occurs. Should it be solved or will it be solved in the Edgy release?

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the bug should be kept open as long as the bug is not fixed

Revision history for this message
Máté Őry (orymate) wrote :

We have now Gutsy (4 Gnome and Ubuntu releases, two and a half year) and Nautilus can't be used as a working FTP client.

Revision history for this message
Máté Őry (orymate) wrote :

The new gnome virtual fs has not solved the bug.

Revision history for this message
Máté Őry (orymate) wrote :

Gnome bug #45889 has nothing to do with this.

Changed in nautilus:
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Changed in nautilus:
importance: Medium → Low
milestone: ubuntu-6.06 → none
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Changed in nautilus:
status: Confirmed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
superturboultra (dzinkevich) wrote :

It appears like this is still an issue.

Revision history for this message
benste (benste) wrote :

yes it is

Revision history for this message
Máté Őry (orymate) wrote :

New upstream bug for gvfs. Old one set to WONTFIX.

Changed in nautilus:
status: Won't Fix → Unknown
A. Walton (awalton)
Changed in gvfs:
status: Triaged → In Progress
Changed in nautilus:
status: Unknown → Invalid
Changed in gvfs:
status: Unknown → New
Changed in gvfs:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
aleritty (aleritty) wrote :

This bug is here from hoary... I am on jaunty and it isn't fixed!

How can we help to fix this bug?

Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

AleRitty, providing a patch is the best way to help the bug to gets fixed.

Changed in gvfs:
importance: Unknown → Wishlist
Changed in nautilus:
importance: Unknown → Wishlist
status: Invalid → Unknown
Changed in nautilus:
status: Unknown → Invalid
Revision history for this message
aleritty (aleritty) wrote :

Why invalid?Is a bug confirmed and present since Hoary!

Changed in gvfs:
importance: Wishlist → Unknown
status: Confirmed → Unknown
Changed in gvfs:
importance: Unknown → Wishlist
status: Unknown → Fix Released
Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) → nobody
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

the issue should be fixed in the current version

Changed in gvfs (Ubuntu):
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Paco Avila (monkiki) wrote :

Nice to know that has been fixed :)

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.