Seamonkey will not show email addresses in address book

Binary package hint: seamonkey

 Seamonkey fails to show emails in address book when clicking on compose>addresses.
If you click on address book in the window menu item it shows all emails in each address book.

It should show all addresses in either view.

To reproduce:
1. Open seamonkey mail/news
2. Compose mail
3. Click on addesses in the toolbar

actual results:
doesnt show email addresses

expexted results:
should show contacts in any view used.

Marking confirmed since its confirmed upstream

I don`t think I understand this bug report.
You have have Personal adresses and Collected adresses.

Also you can choose in Edit>Preferences>Mail&Newsgroups>Adressing ,
wheither collected adresses should be put in Collected Addresses or in Personal addresses.

When you click on +Adresss it opens Personal Adress book by default.
If there is no addresses in Personal adress book, there will be no addresses displayed.

Do you think there should be default to open collected adresses instead of personal adresses?
What for?
There is reason why Different views are there. I would like to separate collected addresses
from any mail I recieved from my Address book, like it is now.

Now I see that bug report is about seamonkey 2, development version.
Please make sure to mention what version you file bug against, next time.

1.1.14 has this problem also. when you open SM email and click on uploading screenshots.
This bug is mainly for me to track upstream bug. I am pretty much working on Seamoney again as well as other Mozilla relate apps.

I will add myself to the bug assignee so we know I'm working on it. This one is before clicking personal address in the compose>Address

The first upload is after clicking on the Personal Address Book

I'm sorry this was fixed in seamonkey 1.1.14
So atm it is SM2

To clear the record, I reported the bug identifying SeaMonkey as follows:

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20080925121544 SeaMonkey/2.0a1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20080925121544 SeaMonkey/2.0a1

This is SM 2.0a1

On 03/05/2009 03:15 PM, Joseph T. Adinolf wrote:
> To clear the record, I reported the bug identifying SeaMonkey as
> follows:
>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20080925121544 SeaMonkey/2.0a1
> Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.9.1b1pre) Gecko/20080925121544 SeaMonkey/2.0a1
>
> This is SM 2.0a1
>
We really shouldn't track PPA versions or upstream versions installed in
Ubuntu as an ubuntu bug since they are not released to archives. I'm
closing this part of the bug, Can you please track this bug using
upstreams tracker. You can set your email settings to send you emails on
comments to the bug report.

 status invalid

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

Waiting to see what upstream does if anything

this will be fixed in 2.0 i havent gotten around to 2.0 in a while and last i looked there were alot of patches to play will however there is a good chance 2.1 will end up in my PPA when i get time. I will see if we can move 2.0 to daily PPA and maybe in Lucid's archives

I downloaded and installed the latest update yesterday and it appears that the bug has been fixed.

Whoever is responsible, thank you very much.

joseph:
What version are you using?
apt-cache policy seamonkey seamonkey-2.0
let me know output of the above command

John, all I see under about is 2.0pre so that is no help to you. It would be yesterday morning's version.

The addresses are still there and I could have sworn that the names were in alphabetical order yesterday. They are not today.

They are in alphabetical order in Address Book.

apt-cache policy seamonkey seamonkey-2.0
let me know output of the above command

I'm sorry but this means nothing to me.

I am not a computer expert.

On 10/15/2009 02:20 PM, Joseph T. Adinolf wrote:
> apt-cache policy seamonkey seamonkey-2.0
> let me know output of the above command
>
> I'm sorry but this means nothing to me.
>
> I am not a computer expert.
>
It no longer matters since you are using upstream 2.0
but the following is a command that you would type in a
terminal/console
apt-cache policy seamonkey-2.0

it will give output as to versions and repos that it is in.

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III

Anyway, ran today's update and the addresses are still there but not yet in alphabetical order.

Closed our task as wont fix since we will not fix this in 1.1.x however once we get 2.0 in archives (hopfuly Lucid) this will be fixed.
As for your other address boog bug please file it upstream, these 2 bugs are unrelated.

Well, 2.0 was released today. The addresses are there but names are still not in alphabetical order.

Any chance that could be fixed some day?

On 10/28/2009 03:04 AM, Joseph T. Adinolf wrote:
> Well, 2.0 was released today. The addresses are there but names are
> still not in alphabetical order.
>
> Any chance that could be fixed some day?
>
This needs to be fixed upstream not by us please file and
track your bug there

--
Sincerely Yours,
    John Vivirito

https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246

"How can i get lost, if i have no where to go"
    -- Metallica from Unforgiven III