Partitioner shows Xubuntu as "Ubuntu Maverick"

Bug #628221 reported by Ronald McCollam
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Expired
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: ubiquity

During partitioning, new Xubuntu partitions are incorrectly marked as Ubuntu instead. Existing partitions with Xubuntu installed are reported correctly.

(See screenshot.)

Observed with Xubuntu maverick 20100901 i386 image on VirtualBox.

Tags: iso-testing
Revision history for this message
Ronald McCollam (fader) wrote :
tags: added: iso-testing
Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Thank you for reporting this bug. I can confirm this using the Xubuntu Maverick Desktop 64bit image dated 20100901. Of course, users should already know if they installed Ubuntu or Xubuntu, but many will not. This does not apply to a full disk install, but only when resizing an existing partition.

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Mario Limonciello (superm1) wrote :

I think the description here is wrong; the partitioner is recognizing the existing install as Ubuntu(/dev/sda1), and the new one it's adding as Xubuntu (/dev/sda2).

This is because the installer doesn't query details of the OS already on the system beyond the LSB information.

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

You are correct. The existing partition is shown as Ubuntu Maverick, while the new one is shown as Xubuntu.

Until this image, both were shown as Xubuntu.

Revision history for this message
Ronald McCollam (fader) wrote :

My mistake. This bug may be invalid then, but I'll let wiser heads than mine decide.

Though is it worth filing another bug about it being difficult to tell which is the existing install and which is the new install? I assume most people will be coming from Windows, but it's possible that someone would want to install multiple flavors of Ubuntu and become confused as I did.

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Updated. This is still being shown wrong as of the Xubuntu desktop image dated 2010-09-17.

Revision history for this message
Evan (ev) wrote :

Can you attach /etc/lsb-release from the system that's incorrectly displaying at "Ubuntu Maverick"?

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Here is the contents of /etc/lsb-release from the first, whole disk installation. I also installed 10.04 and 8.04 the same way. This issue only affects maverick, since this is the first time we show a graphic image of the drives. The file contents are the same on all versions.

Revision history for this message
Colin Watson (cjwatson) wrote :

I wouldn't expect lsb-release to differ - we intentionally don't change this for in-archive Ubuntu flavours.

Revision history for this message
Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) wrote :

This release of Ubuntu is no longer receiving maintenance updates. If this is still an issue on a maintained version of Ubuntu please let us know.

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.