gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in panel_profile_load_toplevel()

Bug #749952 reported by dmiranda
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gnome-panel

gnome panel chashes a lot

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: gnome-panel 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Architecture: i386
CheckboxSubmission: 523487039d9464607924e4e677ae5d5d
CheckboxSystem: 669b662da410063cc918e0f60cf6cddf
Date: Mon Apr 4 02:09:11 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
GConfNonDefault:
 /apps/panel/general/applet_id_list=[clock_screen0,notification_area_screen0,indicator_applet_screen0,fast_user_switch_screen0,applet_0,applet_1,applet_2]
 /apps/panel/general/toplevel_id_list=[top_panel_screen0]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt_PT:en_US:en
 LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xfa9d6e <vfprintf+11278>: repnz scas %es:(%edi),%al
 PC (0x00fa9d6e) ok
 source "%es:(%edi)" (0x000000fb) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%al" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
StacktraceTop:
 panel_profile_load_toplevel ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 panel_profile_load ()
 main ()
Title: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in panel_profile_load_toplevel()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-08 (27 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
dmiranda (dmiranda) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #451261, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.