YOU MUST BE RIGHT...
I WISH I COULD BE OF MORE HELP, UNFORTUNATELY...

I DO NOT KNOW WHAT WENT WRONG...I MEAN WITH ALL THE APT GETS AND STUFF,  I 
MAY HAVE PUT THE WRONG THING IN THE COMMAND TERMINAL.

 THEY SHOULD HAVE SOME KIND OF "TRIGGER" TO PREVENT THIS SORT OF THING 
HAPPENING. I
 HAD TO RUN BACK TO WINDOWS TRYING TO LEARN THIS "LINUX THING" GOT TO BE A 
BRICK WALL.
 JUST POKING AROUND TRYING TO GET SOUND FOR MY SKYPE SUBSCRIPTION I SPENT 
THREE DAYS AND CAME UP WITH A ZERO. TOO OLD AND NOT CUT OUT FOR THIS KIND OF 
DEAL.

AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE IF I DID SOMETHING WRONG.

BEST REGARDS,

SEBASTIAN
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug 424965] Re: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in 
__getitem__()


I'm not sending these either. We must both be on some kind of mailing
list.

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Sebastian
<email address hidden>wrote:

> LOOK MAN, I AM NOT SENDING ANY EMAILS, YOU ARE TTHE ONE SENDING THEM TO 
> ME.
> I DO NOT USE UBUNTU 9.10 ANY LONGER, IT WAS TOO DIFFICULT TO OPERATE. 
> CHECK
> WITH THE HEAD GUYS WHO RUN THE OP.PLATFORM.
>
> THANK, BEST REGARDS,
>
> S.
> timelab
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 1:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bug 424965] Re: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in
> __getitem__()
>
>
> I want off these emails!  Please do not send any more.
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Launchpad Bug Tracker <
> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>
> > This bug was fixed in the package apport - 1.9.4-0ubuntu1
> >
> > ---------------
> > apport (1.9.4-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
> >
> >  [ Marco Rodrigues ]
> >  * etc/default/apport: Replace the old init.d force_start command by
> >    the Upstart one.
> >  * debian/apport.upstart: If $force_start=1 is given then run the job.
> >  * debian/local/apport-collect: Don't collect information if bug is a
> >    duplicate. (LP: #471429)
> >
> >  [ Martin Pitt ]
> >  * New upstream bug fix release:
> >    - Fix crash when ExecutablePath isn't part of a package. (LP: 
> > #424965)
> >    - hookutils.py, attach_hardware(): Anonymize disk labels. Thanks to
> > Marco
> >      Rodrigues. (LP: #394411)
> >    - hookutils.py, attach_wifi(): Anonymize encryption key (which
> appeared
> > in
> >      hex when being called as root). Thanks to Marco Rodrigues. (LP:
> > #446299)
> >    - launchpad.py: If unset, set bug task source package also for
> > interpreter
> >      crashes.
> >    - apport-gtk: Give details window a minimize/maximize button, which
> > were
> >      missing in some window managers. Thanks to Marien Zwart. (LP:
> > #447749)
> >    - apport-kde: Properly terminate program after closing the last
> dialog.
> >      (LP: #458662)
> >    - hookutils.py, attach_alsa(): Attach /proc/asound/version. (LP:
> > #467233)
> >    - general-hooks/generic.py: Only collect ~/.xsession-errors bits when
> > we
> >      have an ExecutablePath linked to libgtk.
> >  * debian/control: Update Vcs-Bzr: for lucid branch.
> >  * data/package-hooks/source_linux.py: Add interactive questionaire,
> > thanks
> >    Leann Ogasawara! (LP: #444672)
> >  -- Martin Pitt <email address hidden>   Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:06:52
> +0100
> >
> > ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
> >       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
> >
> > --
> > apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of a duplicate bug.
> >
> > Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> > Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed
> >
> > Bug description:
> > SRU information:
> > --------------------------
> > Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a
> > crash
> > against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug
> > trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and
> karmic,
> > and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst).
> >
> > Fix:
> > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629;
> > this does not magically  cause the original crash report to be
> reportable,
> > but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport.
> >
> > Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages()
> could
> > just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would
> > not
> > mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I 
> > don't
> > see a real regression potential  here.
> >
> > ProblemType: Crash
> > Architecture: i386
> > Date: Sat Sep  5 21:22:30 2009
> > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> > ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
> > InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
> > NonfreeKernelModules: wl
> > Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1
> > PackageArchitecture: all
> > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
> > ProcEnviron:
> >  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> >  SHELL=/bin/bash
> > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic
> > PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk']
> > SourcePackage: apport
> > Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
> > Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686
> > UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>
> Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> SRU information:
> --------------------------
> Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a 
> crash
> against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug
> trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and karmic,
> and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst).
>
> Fix:
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629 ;
> this does not magically  cause the original crash report to be reportable,
> but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport.
>
> Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() could
> just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would 
> not
> mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I don't
> see a real regression potential  here.
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: i386
> Date: Sat Sep  5 21:22:30 2009
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
> InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
> NonfreeKernelModules: wl
> Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1
> PackageArchitecture: all
> ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
> ProcEnviron:
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic
> PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk']
> SourcePackage: apport
> Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686
> UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare
>
> --
> apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of a duplicate bug.
>
> Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
> Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> SRU information:
> --------------------------
> Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a 
> crash
> against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug
> trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and karmic,
> and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst).
>
> Fix:
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629 ;
> this does not magically  cause the original crash report to be reportable,
> but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport.
>
> Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() could
> just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would 
> not
> mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I don't
> see a real regression potential  here.
>
> ProblemType: Crash
> Architecture: i386
> Date: Sat Sep  5 21:22:30 2009
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
> InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
> NonfreeKernelModules: wl
> Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1
> PackageArchitecture: all
> ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
> ProcEnviron:
>  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>  SHELL=/bin/bash
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic
> PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk']
> SourcePackage: apport
> Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
> Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686
> UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare
>
>
>

-- 
apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of a duplicate bug.

Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed

Bug description:
SRU information:
--------------------------
Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a crash 
against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug 
trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and karmic, 
and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst).

Fix: 
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629 ; 
this does not magically  cause the original crash report to be reportable, 
but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport.

Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() could 
just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would not 
mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I don't 
see a real regression potential  here.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Sep  5 21:22:30 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic
PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk']
SourcePackage: apport
Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare