[SRU] cinepaint has unmet dependencies

Bug #65457 reported by Sivan Greenberg
74
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
cinepaint (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
Edgy
Fix Released
Medium
Adrien Cunin

Bug Description

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 affects distros/ubuntu/cinepaint
 status confirmed
 subscribe motu

text:
A run of
  LC_ALL=C apt-cache -i unmet | grep ^Package | cut -d' ' -f2 | sort -u | \
     xargs apt-cache showsrc | grep Package | sed 's/Package\:\ //g' | sort -u
indicates that the source package cinepaint has binary packages that are not
installable at the moment.

Please have a look and make sure it's installable again.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFLPYy/GNOP6hwhMIRAkPMAJ0ZBAgLCFHo+pWMhLRpQ+WcIXP4gwCaAuU7
yKRUrr8q1I01X8AFdqxxIQI=
=l/E9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

SRU proposal (Adrien Cunin):

This bug makes the package uninstallable.
The fix is a change in the build dependencies: libgutenprintui2-dev instead of libgutenprintui1-dev.
Already fixed in feisty.

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

cinepaint (0.20-1-2) build depends on libgutenprintui1-dev (not available)

cinepaint (0.20-1-2, 0.19-1-1build1) depends on:

libgutenprintui1-1 (>= 5.0.0~rc2) [not amd64] (not available)

libopenexr2c2 (>= 1.2.2) [amd64] (not available)

Changed in cinepaint:
assignee: nobody → nafallo
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Christopher Boyd (cmichaelboyd) wrote :

This is a duplicate of bug #63318.

Changed in cinepaint:
assignee: nafallo → nobody
status: In Progress → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

We have libgutenprintui2-1 (5.0.0-2ubuntu2) in the edgy repos. I wonder if cinepaint will work with that instead?

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

and libopenexr2c2a (1.2.2-4.3) instead of libopenexr2c2 for amd64?

Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

I'll try and fix the first bit with build deps.

I note that it didn't build in dapper for amd64..

Changed in cinepaint:
assignee: nobody → secretlondon
Revision history for this message
Osvaldo (opgago) wrote : Re: [Bug 65457] Re: [UNMETDEPS] cinepaint has unmet dependencies

Hi. It doesn't work. Error message while trying to install at Out 31, 23:27 UTC/GMT

"cinepaint:
 Depende: libgutenprintui1-1 (>=5.0.0~rc2) but it is not installable"

I have libgutenprintui2-1 (5.0.0-2ubuntu2) installed, but I couldn't install cinepaint.

Best regards

Osvaldo

Caroline Ford <email address hidden> wrote: We have libgutenprintui2-1 (5.0.0-2ubuntu2) in the edgy repos. I wonder
if cinepaint will work with that instead?

--
[UNMETDEPS] cinepaint has unmet dependencies
https://launchpad.net/bugs/65457

---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.

Revision history for this message
Sarah Kowalik (hobbsee-deactivatedaccount) wrote : Re: [UNMETDEPS] cinepaint has unmet dependencies

I'll take care of this merge during feisty. I suspect that cinepaint will be automatically synced, due to the incorrect version number.

Revision history for this message
Nafallo Bjälevik (nafallo) wrote : Re: [Bug 65457] Re: [UNMETDEPS] cinepaint has unmet dependencies

fre 2006-11-17 klockan 13:30 +0000 skrev Sarah Hobbs:
> I'll take care of this merge during feisty. I suspect that cinepaint
> will be automatically synced, due to the incorrect version number.

Thanks for stepping up Sarah :-).
--
Christian Bjälevik <email address hidden>

A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?

Revision history for this message
Sarah Kowalik (hobbsee-deactivatedaccount) wrote : Re: [UNMETDEPS] cinepaint has unmet dependencies

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:19:33 +1100
Source: cinepaint
Binary: libcinepaint-dev libcinepaint0 cinepaint-data cinepaint
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21-2-0ubuntu1
Distribution: feisty
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Sarah Hobbs <email address hidden>
Description:
 cinepaint - motion picture image painting and retouching tool
 cinepaint-data - data files for CinePaint
 libcinepaint-dev - development library files for CinePaint
 libcinepaint0 - runtime library files for CinePaint
Changes:
 cinepaint (0.21-2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
 .
   * New Upstream Version
   * Removed patch, as the file no longer exists
Files:
 0a7fcf6de76a47c71dbe84e72c8b89b6 864 graphics optional cinepaint_0.21-2-0ubuntu1.dsc
 2cc81ac4ea0f32b4af823e94fa2c7380 11504561 graphics optional cinepaint_0.21-2.orig.tar.gz
 a24f54a88871a1bafb3f6bb1c934a06f 15875 graphics optional cinepaint_0.21-2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFXkYr7/o1b30rzoURApa2AKC2C0yFzz91MFUzOHRywo8Fw8COKACgi+mB
Y6Vc6y7GHVCKzuXGpGPN4YE=
=WMyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Changed in cinepaint:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in cinepaint:
assignee: secretlondon → nobody
Revision history for this message
Caroline Ford (secretlondon) wrote :

Has this been put through SRU for Edgy?

Revision history for this message
Jared Luxenberg (jared-jaredcam) wrote :

Is there any chance that the change will be "backported" to Edgy soon?

Revision history for this message
Adrien Cunin (adri2000) wrote :

Yes, I'm going to attach a SRU debdiff.

Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
Changed in cinepaint:
assignee: nobody → adri2000
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Pascal De Vuyst (pascal-devuyst) wrote :

@Adrien
Please mark "In Progress" if you are working on a Edgy debdiff.

Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Adrien Cunin (adri2000) wrote :

Debdiff for edgy SRU attached.

* Build-Depends: libgutenprintui1-dev -> libgutenprintui2-dev to make the package installable again (Closes: Malone #65457)
* Build-Depends on libpng12-dev to not FTBFS

I had to add a B-D on libpng12-dev because otherwise it FTBFS in edgy. Why? Because this package has not been actually built in edgy (no upload or sync during the edgy development) and libpng12-dev was not needed in dapper. In feisty it is present.

Changed in cinepaint:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote :

Looks sane, +1.

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

+1.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

Also looks fine to me, +1.

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:22:56 +0100
Source: cinepaint
Binary: libcinepaint-dev libcinepaint0 cinepaint-data cinepaint
Architecture: source
Version: 0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1
Distribution: edgy-proposed
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Adrien Cunin <email address hidden>
Description:
 cinepaint - motion picture image painting and retouching tool
 cinepaint-data - data files for CinePaint
 libcinepaint-dev - development library files for CinePaint
 libcinepaint0 - runtime library files for CinePaint
Changes:
 cinepaint (0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1) edgy-proposed; urgency=low
 .
   * Build-Depends: libgutenprintui1-dev -> libgutenprintui2-dev to make the
     package installable again (Closes: Malone #65457)
   * Build-Depends on libpng12-dev to not FTBFS
Files:
 de4c43ac581db315b30335ae3e124dab 887 graphics optional cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1.dsc
 694ba233dde50f6524568b7ae9cced98 15846 graphics optional cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFs/1He9GwFciKvaMRAkTfAKC+ERe6CWbASaqJ39f/+oNtQ4li5ACfd9hG
DJi6y5R9QxeMN7k5zdzZ/OQ=
=ZhoU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
  cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1.dsc: done.
  cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1.diff.gz: done.
  cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.

Revision history for this message
Tollef Fog Heen (tfheen) wrote :

accepted into edgy-proposed; please solicit testing as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/SRU

Changed in cinepaint:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
ville palo (vi64pa) wrote :

Installed successfully, works for me

Revision history for this message
Fridtjof Busse (fbusse-deactivatedaccount-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Works for me as well

Revision history for this message
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf-hildebrandt) wrote :

Installed successfully, works for me

Revision history for this message
shad (eric-pasnet) wrote :

installation successful, no problem at all

Revision history for this message
Pascal De Vuyst (pascal-devuyst) wrote :

Works for me too.

Revision history for this message
MilkaJinka (milkajinka) wrote :

Works perfectly for me on my Edgy box.

Revision history for this message
Jon Leighton (jonleighton) wrote :

Works for me on Edgy.

Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote :

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:51:39 +0100
Source: cinepaint
Binary: libcinepaint-dev libcinepaint0 cinepaint-data cinepaint
Architecture: source
Version: 0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1
Distribution: edgy-updates
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Stefan Potyra <email address hidden>
Description:
 cinepaint - motion picture image painting and retouching tool
 cinepaint-data - data files for CinePaint
 libcinepaint-dev - development library files for CinePaint
 libcinepaint0 - runtime library files for CinePaint
Changes:
 cinepaint (0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1) edgy-updates; urgency=low
 .
   * No change upload, propagate to edgy-updates.
   * Tested by: Jon Leighton, MilkaJinka, Pascal De Vuyst, shad,
     Ralf Hildebrandt, Fridtjof Busse, ville palo.
 .
 cinepaint (0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1~proposed1) edgy-proposed; urgency=low
 .
   * Build-Depends: libgutenprintui1-dev -> libgutenprintui2-dev to make the
     package installable again (Closes: Malone #65457)
   * Build-Depends on libpng12-dev to not FTBFS
Files:
 278ccdf6ebaaaf385962af346a26b733 867 graphics optional cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1.dsc
 c275432a875af7ecef9b8c0ace0b1e6a 15979 graphics optional cinepaint_0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1.diff.gz

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

accepted into edgy-updates

Changed in cinepaint:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
howlingmadhowie (howlingmadhowie) wrote :

i still have a problem installing cinepaint on 64bit edgy. it's not terribly critical for me, but i just thought i'd let you know:

apt-get install cinepaint cinepaint-data

Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten:
  cinepaint: Hängt ab: libopenexr2c2 (>= 1.2.2) ist aber nicht installierbar
             Hängt ab: cinepaint-data (= 0.19-1-1build1) aber 0.20-1-2ubuntu0.1 soll installiert werden

Revision history for this message
Bob Smith (ubuntu-mensetmanus) wrote :

I also cannot install on regular desktop (laptop) edgy. cinepaint-data installs ok, but cinepaint still gives:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  cinepaint: Depends: libgutenprintui1-1 (>= 5.0.0~rc2) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

Should apt-get install work, or should I do something else?

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

'sudo apt-get -f install' doesn't help?

Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote :

Hi,

@howlingmadhowie: the amd64 version of failed to build from source, which is a different bug, see bug #46388 for details.

@Bob Smith: seems like you don't have edgy-updates for *universe* enabled, please check your /etc/apt/sources.list. (the package in updates doesn't have a dependency on libgutenprint1-1, whereas the package in edgy does).

HTH,
     Stefan.

Revision history for this message
Bob Smith (ubuntu-mensetmanus) wrote :

Martin: No, tried that.

Stefan: That did the trick. I don't know why the installed list didn't work, but it's better now.

Thanks!
Bob

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.