Can't allow sites for adding extensions
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Mozilla Firefox |
Invalid
|
Medium
|
||
| | firefox (Ubuntu) |
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
| | firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) |
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: firefox
When i go to http://
version 2.0.0.2+1-0ubuntu1
| Changed in firefox: | |
| importance: | Undecided → High |
| Freddy Martinez (freddymartinez9) wrote : | #1 |
| Changed in firefox: | |
| assignee: | nobody → freddymartinez9 |
| status: | Unconfirmed → Needs Info |
| Patrice Vetsel (vetsel-patrice) wrote : | #2 |
Have you tried the link proposed ?
It's seems that this is specifically this link that's not working. I'v tried other sites offering extensions and firefox worked as expected.
I'v desinstalled totem-mozilla/
|
|
#3 |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
When trying to install Google Weblogger Comments extension firefox prevents it by displaying a bar on the top of the browser window. When clicking on the Edit Options button on the bar, nothing happens.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to http://
2. Click Agree and Install button.
3. Click the Edit Options button.
Actual Results:
Nothing happens.
Expected Results:
Popped up a configuration window to allow certain sites to install code.
|
|
#4 |
Functionality has been removed. Use this extension:
https:/
|
|
#5 |
(In reply to comment #1)
> Functionality has been removed. Use this extension:
> https:/
>
Ack, nm, posted to wrong bug.
>
Appears to be a regression from bug 359012.
JSConsole output
Error: webNav.currentURI has no properties
Source File: chrome:
Line: 580
|
|
#7 |
Works fine for me. I click the button and get the Install dialog. If I remove
addons.mozilla.org from the whitelist, I get the notification and can click the
button to edit the options.
For myself using the official 2.0.0.2 I get the error as stated in comment #3 with and without removing addons.mozilla.org from the whitelist using a new profile as well as with my regular profile.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
Neil, what OS did you test this on? Perhaps this is Windows only.
|
|
#10 |
Trunk Mac, I get the browsermessage with the broken button; 2.0.0.2 Win, I get the install prompt with amo whitelisted, or a working browsermessage that whitelists amo (mmm, confusing, since their instructions say to whitelist tools.google.com).
Or, possibly it's a race condition, and that should be "dialup, I get the browsermessage with the broken button, decent connection things work (other than GOOG's insistence on confusing hell out of the minority to save the majority a single click)." I can check various other builds and operating systems when I get back to a slow connection later to see if that makes a difference.
Edit Options works after backing out the patch in bug 359012 though it auto-fills with tools.google.com.
|
|
#12 |
This seems to work for most users, until we have a clear view on what's causing the failure here in some cases not going to block.
Should fix this for 1.8.1.4 though.
| John Vivirito (gnomefreak) wrote : | #13 |
That seems to not be a firefox bug. If you use the mozilla.com site for addons do they work? Do they have the same ones that are on the link you gave? Please try looking for the ones you wanted from http://
| Patrice Vetsel (vetsel-patrice) wrote : | #14 |
"That seems to not be a firefox bug." others persons believe the opposite. Is there a firefox hacker here ?!
And indeed this bug occur only at http://
| John Vivirito (gnomefreak) wrote : | #15 |
Alexander i assigned htis to you to look at. My concern is that its only one site with a few extenstions on it that are failing as i understand it.
| Changed in firefox: | |
| assignee: | freddymartinez9 → asac |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:43:27AM -0000, Patrice Vetsel wrote:
> "That seems to not be a firefox bug." others persons believe the
> opposite. Is there a firefox hacker here ?!
>
> And indeed this bug occur only at http://
> page
>
this bug is known upstream and appears to be a regression from a
previous fix.
Upstream bug is: https:/
- Alexander
| Changed in firefox: | |
| assignee: | asac → mozilla-bugs |
| status: | Needs Info → In Progress |
| Alexander Sack (asac) wrote : | #17 |
setting to confirm so I know that I should try to push upstream to do something about this.
| Changed in firefox: | |
| status: | In Progress → Confirmed |
| Changed in firefox: | |
| status: | Unknown → Confirmed |
|
|
#18 |
Finally remembered to take my laptop to a better connection: yes, race condition (unless Google's insane enough to sniff connection speed and do different things, which I doubt but didn't check).
Over dialup, I get the install-blocked infobar with a broken edit button, and if I manually whitelist tools.google.com I get the install prompt; with the same build (and the same run-instance, for that matter) over a decent connection, I get the install prompt unless I remove addons.mozilla.org from the whitelist, in which case I get an infobar with a working edit button that adds amo.
|
|
#19 |
We would like a fix for this, but we're not going to hold the release if we don't get it.
| Changed in firefox: | |
| importance: | High → Undecided |
| status: | Confirmed → In Progress |
|
|
#20 |
Can't fix much here unless we have steps to reproduce.
|
|
#21 |
Sorry if you don't like them, but comment 10 *is* STR - just add
0. Pinch your internet tubes down to 40Kbps or less.
to the STR from comment 0. Connected over dialup, I consistently 100% see the bug; hibernate, go to a faster connection, resume, I don't. I haven't seen Mr. Strong or the reporter say "oh, yeah, I was testing over a crappy-slow connection," but then I also haven't seen anyone else say "no, I went to my mom's with 28.8 AOL dialup, and I still don't see it there."
Neil, are you able to test by either simulating a slow connection or using a slow connection? This is 100% reproduceable for me when using a slow connection.
|
|
#23 |
(In reply to comment #14)
> Neil, are you able to test by either simulating a slow connection or using a
> slow connection? This is 100% reproduceable for me when using a slow
> connection.
>
I'm not really able to test that right now, no. Would be nice to get a reduced test here
|
|
#24 |
We need reliable STR here somehow. Moving to M9, does QA have any utilities for throttling network speed?
|
|
#25 |
Note also that the edit options button is going away in bug 252830
|
|
#26 |
I'm inclined to vote for WFM, or at least non-blocker. Google has made two significant changes since http://
If you still want to fix it as an abstract problem, I think to reproduce you need a page equivalent to https:/
|
|
#27 |
moving out bugs that don't need to block b1
|
|
#28 |
The edit options button now no longer exists, we appear to have no immediate way to test this so I can't say whether this is still a problem with the allow once button.
|
|
#29 |
Clearing blocking flag. If anyone can still reproduce this in some form, please renominate.
|
|
#30 |
Still may occur on branch, clearing TM.
|
|
#31 |
( please excuse my english, i'm french )
I have the 2.0.0.14 version of Firefox on Windows xp
and i have the word: « modifier » on my menu, but it is not efficient !
I use to édit some pages before printing them ( when i print a page ) with my older version. I was deleting the items that i din't wont to appear on the print page.
But i can't do it anymore !
( But be aware thant i'm not very familiar with complicates download/reinstal actions on my pc. )
big tanks for your help ! if you can !
|
|
#32 |
(In reply to comment #23)
> ( please excuse my english, i'm french )
>
> I have the 2.0.0.14 version of Firefox on Windows xp
>
> and i have the word: « modifier » on my menu, but it is not efficient !
>
> I use to édit some pages before printing them ( when i print a page ) with my
> older version. I was deleting the items that i din't wont to appear on the
> print page.
>
> But i can't do it anymore !
Your problems sound completely unrelated to this bug report. Please seek support before going to bugzilla: http://
| Changed in firefox: | |
| assignee: | mozilla-bugs → nobody |
| status: | In Progress → Triaged |
| Changed in firefox-3.0: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| Changed in firefox: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Invalid |
| Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote : | #34 |
No more fixes for Firefox 2.
| Changed in firefox (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Triaged → Won't Fix |
| Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote : | #35 |
Per upstream, and my own tests, this no longer appears to be an issue. If you are still experiencing, trouble, you can change the status back to New and provide more information as to your current version of Firefox and what exactly is not working.
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.
| Changed in firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Triaged → Invalid |
| Changed in firefox: | |
| importance: | Unknown → Medium |


Can *not* reproduce on my 2.0.0.2 Feisty Herd 5 system. Does this occur under a new profile. Try launching 'firefox -profilemanager' in a terminal (no quotes) and creating a new profile.