Ubuntu
scid-rating-data package

Change log for scid-rating-data package in Ubuntu

1 → 3 of 3 results First • Previous • Next • Last
Published in noble-release
Published in mantic-release
Published in lunar-release
Obsolete in kinetic-release
Deleted in kinetic-proposed (Reason: Moved to kinetic) 
scid-rating-data (202104-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * QA upload.
  * New upstream version 202104.
  * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.0.
  * debian/control: Use "Rules-Requires-Root: no".
  * debian/copyright: use machine-readable copyright.

 -- Boyuan Yang <email address hidden>  Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:49:41 -0400

Available diffs

Superseded in kinetic-release
Published in jammy-release
Obsolete in impish-release
Obsolete in hirsute-release
Deleted in hirsute-proposed (Reason: moved to Release) 
scid-rating-data (200901-3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * QA upload.
  * Source-only upload before Debian 11 release.
  * Orphan the package.
  * Refresh packaging:
    + Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1.
    + Bump debhelper compat to v13.
    + Add Vcs-* fields.
  * Set package to be Multi-Arch: foreign.
  * debian/source/format: Use "3.0 (quilt)" format.
  * Downgrade the dependency of scid to recommendation. This allows
    the package to be marked as Multi-Arch: foreign.

 -- Boyuan Yang <email address hidden>  Wed, 23 Dec 2020 11:32:31 -0500

Available diffs

Superseded in hirsute-release
Obsolete in groovy-release
Published in focal-release
Obsolete in eoan-release
Obsolete in disco-release
Obsolete in cosmic-release
Published in bionic-release
Obsolete in artful-release
Obsolete in zesty-release
Obsolete in yakkety-release
Published in xenial-release
Obsolete in wily-release
Obsolete in vivid-release
Obsolete in utopic-release
Published in trusty-release
Obsolete in saucy-release
Obsolete in raring-release
Obsolete in quantal-release
Published in precise-release
Obsolete in oneiric-release
Obsolete in natty-release
Obsolete in maverick-release 
scid-rating-data (200901-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Corrected the GPL version in the copyright. It has to be GPL-2
    and not as I was mistaken GPL-3. Thanks for the hint to Torsten 
    Werner.
1 → 3 of 3 results First • Previous • Next • Last