libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
glibc (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
glibc (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
High
|
Jeff Bailey |
Jeff Bailey (jbailey) wrote : | #1 |
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #2 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:29:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: serious
Architecture: powerpc
Subject says it: while upgrading from a rather dated testing install
(around Apr. 05) with libc6 2.2.5-11.8 to current testing, a number of
things went wrong.
Most notably, upon unpacking libc6 2.3.5-6, the libc6 postinstall failed
with ldconfig segfaulting. This error, in the middle of an upgrade that
required Force-LoopBreak, left me unable to recover normally. I forced the
upgrade to proceed hoping some other package yet to be installed would
restore normal ldconfig function, to no avail.
Unpacking the old 2.2.5-11.8 ldconfig, however, fixed my system perfectly.
Synopsis:
broken ldconfig: from libc6 2.3.5-6 (perhaps earlier versions are also
affected)
working ldconfig: from libc6 2.2.5-11.8
kernel version: 2.2.20-pmac (Debian package, unknown version)
/proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 0
cpu : 750
temperature : 0 C
clock : 233MHz
revision : 2.1
bogomips : 467.44
zero pages : total 0 (0Kb) current: 0 (0Kb) hits: 0/628 (0%)
machine : Power Macintosh
motherboard : AAPL,Gossamer MacRISC
L2 cache : 512K unified pipelined-
memory : 160MB
pmac-generation : OldWorld
Please advise how to further debug this (gdb won't help, and the
disassembly of both binaries differ too much to give any meaningful info).
Michael
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #3 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 18:22:34 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>
To: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
Michael Schmitz a �it :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.5-6
> Severity: serious
> Architecture: powerpc
>
> Subject says it: while upgrading from a rather dated testing install
> (around Apr. 05) with libc6 2.2.5-11.8 to current testing, a number of
> things went wrong.
I am running unstable on an Oldworld PowerMac, kernel 2.6.8, and I don't
have any problem.
Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
Woody -> Etch upgrade.
> Most notably, upon unpacking libc6 2.3.5-6, the libc6 postinstall failed
> with ldconfig segfaulting. This error, in the middle of an upgrade that
> required Force-LoopBreak, left me unable to recover normally. I forced the
> upgrade to proceed hoping some other package yet to be installed would
> restore normal ldconfig function, to no avail.
>
> Unpacking the old 2.2.5-11.8 ldconfig, however, fixed my system perfectly.
>
> Synopsis:
>
> broken ldconfig: from libc6 2.3.5-6 (perhaps earlier versions are also
> affected)
>
> working ldconfig: from libc6 2.2.5-11.8
>
> kernel version: 2.2.20-pmac (Debian package, unknown version)
This is a rather old version, not even available in Debian Sarge.
I suggest you to upgrade to Debian Sarge first (and also your kernel to
a 2.4 or 2.6 version), before trying to upgrade to testing or unstable.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
`- people.
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #4 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:22:43 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
--R+My9LyyhiUvIEro
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
severity 326220 important
thanks
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 06:22:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
> 2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
> Woody -> Etch upgrade.
>> kernel version: 2.2.20-pmac (Debian package, unknown version)
> This is a rather old version, not even available in Debian Sarge.
> I suggest you to upgrade to Debian Sarge first (and also your kernel to=
=20
> a 2.4 or 2.6 version), before trying to upgrade to testing or unstable.
Yes, for both of these reasons, this is not a serious-severity bug.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://
--R+My9LyyhiUvIEro
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDGMKiKN6
UyK3fv2EmlA7IDf
=8mZT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--R+My9LyyhiUvI
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #5 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 10:30:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
To: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>
cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
reassign 326220 apt
> Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
> 2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
> Woody -> Etch upgrade.
So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
to upgrade from woody to current testing/unstable is what I'd consider a
bug in its own right.
Besides, what's the proposed fix? etch ldconfig just doesn't work, so what
piece am I missing?
IIRC woody was still stable at that time, so it isn't all that outdated.
> > kernel version: 2.2.20-pmac (Debian package, unknown version)
>
> This is a rather old version, not even available in Debian Sarge.
>
> I suggest you to upgrade to Debian Sarge first (and also your kernel to
> a 2.4 or 2.6 version), before trying to upgrade to testing or unstable.
Well, apt or dpkg should have figured that out, and warned me off to not
attempt the upgrade, right? Yet another bug.
The system is booted using a floppy, I'm not sure I can even fit a 2.4 or
2.6 kernel on there. Either way, 'you should not try that' is not an
option if there's no warning during the upgrade. Once ldconfig has been
installed, the upgrade is shot. Nice way to tell your average user 'just
wipe the system and install ubuntu'. Debian used to pride itself on being
able to upgrade from oldstable to unstable without a hitch, and I've done
that before, even remotely.
Reassigning to apt, CC to debian-powerpc as a warning to others. Repeat
after me: 'it's not libc's fault if ldconfig breaks'.
Michael
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #6 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:04:12 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
Cc: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:30:22AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> reassign 326220 apt
>
> > Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
> > 2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
> > Woody -> Etch upgrade.
>
> So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
> to upgrade from woody to current testing/unstable is what I'd consider a
> bug in its own right.
>
> Besides, what's the proposed fix? etch ldconfig just doesn't work, so what
> piece am I missing?
>
> IIRC woody was still stable at that time, so it isn't all that outdated.
>
> > > kernel version: 2.2.20-pmac (Debian package, unknown version)
> >
> > This is a rather old version, not even available in Debian Sarge.
> >
> > I suggest you to upgrade to Debian Sarge first (and also your kernel to
> > a 2.4 or 2.6 version), before trying to upgrade to testing or unstable.
>
> Well, apt or dpkg should have figured that out, and warned me off to not
> attempt the upgrade, right? Yet another bug.
>
> The system is booted using a floppy, I'm not sure I can even fit a 2.4 or
> 2.6 kernel on there. Either way, 'you should not try that' is not an
The 2.6.8 sarge kernel did fit on a miboot floppy just fine, thank you, miboot
is not in main though because of the apple-owned boot sector we have no
licence for, but you can find it on :
http://
The current 2.6.12 sid kernel is too big by around 200K, but we will work it
to fit on a miboot size again before the etch release, hopefully, and by then
we may even have quik-floppy support or whatever, so ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #7 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 11:50:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
cc: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
> > Well, apt or dpkg should have figured that out, and warned me off to not
> > attempt the upgrade, right? Yet another bug.
> >
> > The system is booted using a floppy, I'm not sure I can even fit a 2.4 or
> > 2.6 kernel on there. Either way, 'you should not try that' is not an
>
> The 2.6.8 sarge kernel did fit on a miboot floppy just fine, thank you, miboot
Thanks for pointing this out. Now what in libc6 2.3.5 doesn't work anymore
with 2.2 kernels, and why doesn't libc6 test for the running kernel
version before attempting an upgrade?
Should this bug be assigned to apt, or libc6, or what?
I'll try your 2.6.8 sometime; is the stuff required to build miboot
floppies in the powerpc kernel source, and would building a minimal 2.6.13
kernel fit on floppy?
Michael
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #8 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:09:56 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
Cc: Sven Luther <email address hidden>,
Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:50:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Well, apt or dpkg should have figured that out, and warned me off to not
> > > attempt the upgrade, right? Yet another bug.
> > >
> > > The system is booted using a floppy, I'm not sure I can even fit a 2.4 or
> > > 2.6 kernel on there. Either way, 'you should not try that' is not an
> >
> > The 2.6.8 sarge kernel did fit on a miboot floppy just fine, thank you, miboot
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. Now what in libc6 2.3.5 doesn't work anymore
> with 2.2 kernels, and why doesn't libc6 test for the running kernel
> version before attempting an upgrade?
>
> Should this bug be assigned to apt, or libc6, or what?
>
> I'll try your 2.6.8 sometime; is the stuff required to build miboot
Well, we only really tried miboot in debian-installer setup, and i never
really had success with it with 2.6 floppies, except two mysterious times in
oldenbourg one year ago. We use 2.4 miboot floppies there. There has been some
discussion about using hfs formatted floppies with the kernel on it without
miboot though.
> floppies in the powerpc kernel source, and would building a minimal 2.6.13
> kernel fit on floppy?
Yes, with 2.6.8 though the box died when switching the framebuffer on or
something.
you need the miboot package from p.d.o/~
instructions on how to use it in the d-i build stuff.
Friendly,
Sven LUther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #9 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 12:18:22 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>
To: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
CC: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
Michael Schmitz a �it :
> reassign 326220 apt
>
>
>>Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
>>2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
>>Woody -> Etch upgrade.
>
>
> So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
> to upgrade from woody to current testing/unstable is what I'd consider a
> bug in its own right.
It's seems you are not aware that Sarge is out and is now the stable
version. Debian does not support the upgrade from stable (Woody) to
stable + 2 (the future Etch). You have to upgrade to stable + 1 (Sarge)
to first.
So please upgrade to Sarge first.
> Besides, what's the proposed fix? etch ldconfig just doesn't work, so what
> piece am I missing?
Update to Sarge first, and also to a Sarge kernel.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
`- people.
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #10 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 13:26:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>
To: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>
cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
> > So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
> > to upgrade from woody to current testing/unstable is what I'd consider a
> > bug in its own right.
>
> It's seems you are not aware that Sarge is out and is now the stable
I'm well aware of that, thank you very much.
> version. Debian does not support the upgrade from stable (Woody) to
> stable + 2 (the future Etch). You have to upgrade to stable + 1 (Sarge)
> to first.
That's what I've been missing. Please note that this used to be different
in earlier releases, so I had a reasonable expectation this would work.
And there was no warning during the attempted upgrade to make me
reconsider.
> So please upgrade to Sarge first.
What, now that I've already shoehorned testing onto the box? You gotta be
kidding. What would this solve?
> > Besides, what's the proposed fix? etch ldconfig just doesn't work, so what
> > piece am I missing?
>
> Update to Sarge first, and also to a Sarge kernel.
Please add a check to libc6 preinst that makes sure the running kernel (as
determined by uname -r, just like is already done for i386, sparc sun4m,
hppa, parisc64, mips and amd64) is recent enough for powerpc ldconfig from
libc6 2.3.5 to work. You have this check for other architectures to
prevent bad things from happening, so apparently permitting ldconfig
breakage on powerpc is a bug, and a serious one at that.
To point out the not-so-obvious: I recovered my system just fine. I ask
for such a check to be added for the next person to upgrade from woody.
I'm willing to help testing just what kernel feature is missing in my
kernel, or what exact kernel version would be OK to use. I indicated as
much in my initial bug report. If you already know the appropriate kernel
versions, why not have that check? If you don't know them, why do you give
me that 'dont do that, stupid' crap instead of taking me up on my offer to
help debug this?
To put this into perspective: I need this old G3 as a fallback developer
machine to debug a problem with nvsetenv on OldWorld, as long as my
PowerBook is being repaired. While updating that G3, I trip over a severe
libc6 bug, and report it. Color me clueless for assuming these reports are
actually welcomed.
I'm getting seriously fed up with this overgrown project. Any other
distributions out there with decent powerpc support?
Michael
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #11 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 06:54:57 -0300
From: =?iso-8859-
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>,
Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
I know that this may be off-topic for the bug, but just for archiving
purposes, I'm also sending it to the BTS.
On Sep 03 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> There has been some discussion about using hfs formatted floppies with
> the kernel on it without miboot though.
Are you talking about the discussion we had on debian-powerpc a few days
ago? If yes, then you perhaps misunderstood what I said.
I said that I the method I use is to take the HFS floppy from woody and
replace its kernel with a new generated, bleeding-edge kernel (taken
directly from Andrew Morton experimental tree).
I just checked and, yes, the fake Finder and System folders *are*
miboot.
For more details, please see the comments I made to myself on
<http://
Hope this clears any confusion, Rog=E9rio Brito.
--=20
Rog=E9rio Brito : <email address hidden> : http://
Homepage of the algorithms package : http://
Homepage on freshmeat: http://
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #12 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 13:27:08 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>,
Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>,
Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 06:54:57AM -0300, Rog=E9rio Brito wrote:
> I know that this may be off-topic for the bug, but just for archiving
> purposes, I'm also sending it to the BTS.
>=20
> On Sep 03 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There has been some discussion about using hfs formatted floppies wit=
h
> > the kernel on it without miboot though.
>=20
> Are you talking about the discussion we had on debian-powerpc a few day=
s
> ago? If yes, then you perhaps misunderstood what I said.
>=20
> I said that I the method I use is to take the HFS floppy from woody and
> replace its kernel with a new generated, bleeding-edge kernel (taken
> directly from Andrew Morton experimental tree).
>=20
> I just checked and, yes, the fake Finder and System folders *are*
> miboot.
>=20
> For more details, please see the comments I made to myself on
> <http://
Ok, are you saying that you managed to build miboot floppies using the ol=
d
woody miboot floppies, (i think woody came with do-it-yourself-
ff,
not sure). This would then be a 2.6 kernel. Could you post me the config =
file
for this kernel ?
Could you also try the same kernel with the miboot from
http://
Then do :
gzip -9 vmlinux
dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dmiboot_floppy bs=3D1024 count=3D1440
hformat -l "miboot floppy" miboot_floppy
echo device miboot_floppy > miboot.conf
echo kernel vmlinux.gz root=3D0200 load_ramdisk=3D1 prompt_ramdisk=3D1 d=
evfs=3Dmount debconf/
miboot -c miboot.conf
If this works, it would be nice to do the following :
objcopy -O aixcoff-rs6000 -R .stab -R .stabstr -R .comment -add-sectio=
n=3Dimage=
just after the gzip step, where dummy.o is taken out of
arch/ppc/
mkvmlinuz -a used by d-i currently does this second step, which may be ca=
use
fo this problem.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #13 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 03:36:27 -0300
From: =?iso-8859-
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>,
Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-
Content-
On Sep 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, are you saying that you managed to build miboot floppies using the
> old woody miboot floppies,
Yes, I did.
> (i think woody came with do-it-yourself-
I don't know anything about building miboot from scratch.
> This would then be a 2.6 kernel.
Indeed, I'm running:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rbrito@chagas:~$ uname -a
Linux chagas 2.6.13-rc6-mm1-4.ow #1 Sun Aug 21 07:45:32 BRT 2005 ppc GNU/=
Linux
rbrito@chagas:~$=20
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Could you post me the config file for this kernel ?
Of course. It's attached to this mail.
> Could you also try the same kernel with the miboot from
> http://
I will try this later. Please, don't let me forget this.
Hope this helps, Rog=E9rio.
--=20
Rog=E9rio Brito : <email address hidden> : http://
Homepage of the algorithms package : http://
Homepage on freshmeat: http://
--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
QlpoOTFBWSZTWUM
3M2Ze2mniAe9qqj
aYjRpoAGgmjQEam
SeqeaSNTzUnpDyg
AAANHT9LD6fh/
h+Dmz9TYVwVfp3/
2gKFYKAI422BVYK
TNDqlqTUSmFCoLI
Xa6VMTb36MmlVip
rMyUzNKh2UikTwO
2sse8IoRw0P9OdP
w3XOmnxpJ7PLWmd
p/H5m/doz+
rJ0fpDjX1BfWw46
p/109PcN7a1bpsf
tOvfDm314pJFVrO
XZZeqSwYswpbWHD
Hw76jHNt4Qj170t
MCn9jr2NeXkduMf
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #14 |
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:44:49 +0200
From: Sven Luther <email address hidden>
To: Sven Luther <email address hidden>,
Michael Schmitz <email address hidden>,
Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#326220: libc6 2.3.5 ldconfig segfaults on powerpc oldworld
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:36:27AM -0300, Rog=E9rio Brito wrote:
> On Sep 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, are you saying that you managed to build miboot floppies using th=
e
> > old woody miboot floppies,
>=20
> Yes, I did.
>=20
> > (i think woody came with do-it-yourself-
>=20
> I don't know anything about building miboot from scratch.
>=20
> > This would then be a 2.6 kernel.
>=20
> Indeed, I'm running:
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> rbrito@chagas:~$ uname -a
> Linux chagas 2.6.13-rc6-mm1-4.ow #1 Sun Aug 21 07:45:32 BRT 2005 ppc GN=
U/Linux
> rbrito@chagas:~$=20
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>=20
> > Could you post me the config file for this kernel ?
>=20
> Of course. It's attached to this mail.
>=20
> > Could you also try the same kernel with the miboot from
> > http://
>=20
> I will try this later. Please, don't let me forget this.
Ok, i will ping you next WE. if i don't hear from you before and don't fo=
rget
myself :)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote : | #15 |
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 22:29:39 -0400
From: "<email address hidden>" <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Check out the eCard I sent you from Yahoo! Greetings
Viewing your eCard is a snap! Just choose from the following options:
Click on the following link:
http://
or
Copy and paste the above link into your web browser's address window.
or
Enter this eCard number, 1612172124119, on our eCard Pick Up page at
http://
We hope you enjoy your eCard. If you have any comments or questions, please visit
http://
Thanks for using Yahoo! Greetings with AmericanGreetin
Changed in glibc: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Doesn't apply to us, we don't support upgrades from 2.2 kernels to breezy. =)