Ubuntu
librmagick-ruby package

Breezy backport

Bug #39095 reported by Lucas Nussbaum
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
librmagick-ruby (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Ubuntu Backporters

Bug Description

Hi,

As described in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/2006-April/000780.html, could you please backport librmagick-ruby to breezy ?

Thank you,

Lucas Nussbaum (lucas)
Changed in librmagick-ruby:
assignee: nobody → ubuntu-backporters
Revision history for this message
John Dong (jdong) wrote :

If this is to work, I need debhelper build-dep bumped below 5.

Revision history for this message
Lucas Nussbaum (lucas) wrote :

It's already the case in the package I prepared at http://tiber.tauware.de/~lucas/pkg/librmagick-ruby/

Revision history for this message
Lucas Nussbaum (lucas) wrote : Re: [Bug 39095] Re: Breezy backport

On 11/04/06 at 13:54 +0000, John Dong wrote:
> I can't take that though; All backports have to be built from Ubuntu Dapper
> sources.

The package was built from Dapper sources, but it was modified to build
on Breezy.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| <email address hidden> http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: <email address hidden> GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Revision history for this message
Lucas Nussbaum (lucas) wrote :

(Please reply to launchpad so the discussion gets properly archived)

On 11/04/06 at 14:52 -0400, John Dong wrote:
> no, no, no, as in, backports does not modify Dapper sources period.

The package is a PITA to backport to breezy, since it uses parts of
ruby-pkg-tools which aren't in breezy.

I'm marking this bug as Rejected.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| <email address hidden> http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: <email address hidden> GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Changed in librmagick-ruby:
status: Unconfirmed → Rejected
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.