Worker package crashes in avfs with Ubuntu 12.04 i386

Bug #995642 reported by Jean Goudreault
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1013607: avfsd crashes when using mountavfs. Edit Remove
20
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
avfs (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Stacktrace :

 #0 0x0023c757 in strchrnul () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #1 0x001fe8a9 in vfprintf () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #2 0x002bc8f1 in __vfprintf_chk () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #3 0x002a45da in __vsyslog_chk () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #4 0x002a49f7 in __syslog_chk () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 No symbol table info available.
 #5 0x00b8c6e2 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libavfs.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #6 0x00baafca in ?? () from /usr/lib/libavfs.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #7 0x00badecb in ?? () from /usr/lib/libavfs.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #8 0x00b8f9de in ?? () from /usr/lib/libavfs.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #9 0x00b9459f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libavfs.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #10 0x00b94658 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libavfs.so.0
 No symbol table info available.
 #11 0x080fa610 in ?? ()

I had to recompile Worker without avfs support to have it work.
It was working fine on Ubuntu 11.10 but crashes on Ubuntu 12.04 because of a bug in avfs.
Package : Worker 2.18.1-1

Revision history for this message
Jean Goudreault (pulsarjg) wrote :

Dupe of bug #913077

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in avfs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Tomas Pospisek (tpo-deb) wrote :

See also bug #1013607

Revision history for this message
Loïc Minier (lool) wrote :

(bug #913077 is in another package, so not really a dupe but rather another instance of a package not coping with stack protector.)

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.