Comment 7 for bug 1932976

Thanks for the additional information.

We have at least two scenarios:

a) keep raid array and partition table as-is {preserve: true, wipe: None}
b) keep raid array and wipe partition table {preserve: true, wipe: superblock}

That looks like we could update disk_handler to run the preserve path if preserve: true and wipe is None (unset).

We could also extend this wipe check only to composable types (ie, we could check type:XXX in disk_handler and only check preserve if type is disk).

I think the latter works better (ignoring preserve setting if info's type doesn't match the handler).

Thoughts?