On 2-Oct-06, at 10:14 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> ** Description changed:
[snip]
> Stuart Bishop reported on 2006-09-04 that of the 45382 bugs filed in
> - only one place, 7134 -- or 15.7% -- were duplicates of bugs that
> were
> - filed in one different place. So helping the reporter find the
> - appropriate product or package to begin with could save time for, on
> - average, at least one out of every seven bugs.
> + only one place, 7134 (15.7%) were duplicates; and of these, 145 were
> + duplicates of bugs that were filed in one different place. So
> helping
> + the reporter find the appropriate product or package to begin
> with could
> + save time for, on average, 3% of bug reports.
On 2-Oct-06, at 10:14 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> ** Description changed:
[snip]
> Stuart Bishop reported on 2006-09-04 that of the 45382 bugs filed in
> - only one place, 7134 -- or 15.7% -- were duplicates of bugs that
> were
> - filed in one different place. So helping the reporter find the
> - appropriate product or package to begin with could save time for, on
> - average, at least one out of every seven bugs.
> + only one place, 7134 (15.7%) were duplicates; and of these, 145 were
> + duplicates of bugs that were filed in one different place. So
> helping
> + the reporter find the appropriate product or package to begin
> with could
> + save time for, on average, 3% of bug reports.
Don't you mean 0.3%? This is insignificant, IMHO.