We've discussed this at the CC meeting. What happens is the following:
a) Kamion will proofread the CoC and send us a diff to <email address hidden>
b) We will need to increase the version number (I hope Kamion will tell us the version in his email too)
I asked if people needed to re-sign and they said there is no need as long as people can see a list of versions and a reason for change (does our data model support this?)
In the long term, the fact that people need to re-sign to become Ubunteros is a policy decision made on a case-by-case basis -- if we change the content we may require this.
Is this enough for us to move ahead here (pending Kamion's email?)
We've discussed this at the CC meeting. What happens is the following:
a) Kamion will proofread the CoC and send us a diff to <email address hidden>
b) We will need to increase the version number (I hope Kamion will tell us the version in his email too)
I asked if people needed to re-sign and they said there is no need as long as people can see a list of versions and a reason for change (does our data model support this?)
In the long term, the fact that people need to re-sign to become Ubunteros is a policy decision made on a case-by-case basis -- if we change the content we may require this.
Is this enough for us to move ahead here (pending Kamion's email?)