On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 07:06:09PM -0000, Rocco Stanzione wrote:
> The idea in my mind is that it's ripe for abuse, like triaging, where
> ubuntu-qa membership is a prerequisite. Maybe we could apply the same
> logic to confirming one's own bugs.
I agree that Importance is something that only selected individuals should be
able to change. That prevents the reporter changing the importance
trying to "FIX ME FIX ME FIX ME! I'M A IMPORTANT BUG" thing.
I don't see lots of people changing the bug status trying to get more
attention or abusing the system. Do you see this kind of behaviour in Ubuntu
bugs?
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 07:06:09PM -0000, Rocco Stanzione wrote:
> The idea in my mind is that it's ripe for abuse, like triaging, where
> ubuntu-qa membership is a prerequisite. Maybe we could apply the same
> logic to confirming one's own bugs.
I agree that Importance is something that only selected individuals should be
able to change. That prevents the reporter changing the importance
trying to "FIX ME FIX ME FIX ME! I'M A IMPORTANT BUG" thing.
I don't see lots of people changing the bug status trying to get more
attention or abusing the system. Do you see this kind of behaviour in Ubuntu
bugs?
--
Diogo M. Matsubara