On 1/31/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> What Robert meant there is that we don't need to test on staging; it can
> go direct to lpnet from here.
>
> So, we should still do both these rts, but there is no ordering
> dependency between them.
>
Since it all seems to be blocked on losa time, I didn't think there was
a need for a separate rt. It needs to be deployed in both places anyway.
However, since you felt it was warranted, rt #43756. You've been CC'd
and it is now in the queue.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 1/31/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
> What Robert meant there is that we don't need to test on staging; it can
> go direct to lpnet from here.
>
> So, we should still do both these rts, but there is no ordering
> dependency between them.
>
Since it all seems to be blocked on losa time, I didn't think there was
a need for a separate rt. It needs to be deployed in both places anyway.
However, since you felt it was warranted, rt #43756. You've been CC'd
and it is now in the queue.
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAk1 IITQACgkQJdeBCY SNAAOY0wCgormoB xi3o+Y1N1ueGN5a D2uO FcxUxCi1zpRbK+ J+m
jPEAnj09wA16jMi
=sKir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----