On 6 Dec 2006, David Allouche <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Add a branch status called "Vintage" for those "Mature" branches that
> you don't want to see all the time.
>
> How is this practically different from "Abandoned"?
>
> I guess that it is intended for things like historical unmaintained
> release branches. But then it's equivalent to "Abandoned" for all
> intents and purposes.
It has a different connotation of the quality of what's in the branch.
However, I think we can go ahead with filtering without blocking on
adding this.
I agree with the basic approach of allowing filtering to either specific
statuses or to useful standard subsets.
On 6 Dec 2006, David Allouche <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Add a branch status called "Vintage" for those "Mature" branches that
> you don't want to see all the time.
>
> How is this practically different from "Abandoned"?
>
> I guess that it is intended for things like historical unmaintained
> release branches. But then it's equivalent to "Abandoned" for all
> intents and purposes.
It has a different connotation of the quality of what's in the branch.
However, I think we can go ahead with filtering without blocking on
adding this.
I agree with the basic approach of allowing filtering to either specific
statuses or to useful standard subsets.
--
Martin