On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:27:28PM -0000, Stuart Bishop wrote:
[...]
>
> It looks like the only uses of secure_url are places where we want this
> behaviour, so I don't see the need for a new method - just change the
> existing secure_url property?
>
Yeah, this is what I initially suggested, but Steve said he was unhappy with
a secure_url property which may return an http or https URL, and I kind of
agree with him.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:27:28PM -0000, Stuart Bishop wrote:
[...]
>
> It looks like the only uses of secure_url are places where we want this
> behaviour, so I don't see the need for a new method - just change the
> existing secure_url property?
>
Yeah, this is what I initially suggested, but Steve said he was unhappy with
a secure_url property which may return an http or https URL, and I kind of
agree with him.