Comment 1 for bug 788757

Revision history for this message
Cody Boisclair (codeman38) wrote :

For the record, those are glyphs 1250--1262 in glyph ordering. They're all named as *alternates* for the appropriate code points (e.g., "SF040000.001"), but not as the regular glyphs for those code points (e.g., "SF040000"); changing the glyph names to remove the ".001" should fix this.