How on earth can this NOT be a bug? As I said I nowhere told the system to be so insane and use Australian mirros (that it does is probably a bug too). As an Ubuntu user I do not care what mirrors are used but I expect them NOT to be broken.
This bug has been created exactly to cause somebody fix what is broken.
How do you (who has "rejected" this bug) expect a user who is confronted with an updated manager that first suggests updates and then fails downloading them (for days!) to proceed??
Just saw that this has been "rejected".
How on earth can this NOT be a bug? As I said I nowhere told the system to be so insane and use Australian mirros (that it does is probably a bug too). As an Ubuntu user I do not care what mirrors are used but I expect them NOT to be broken.
This bug has been created exactly to cause somebody fix what is broken.
How do you (who has "rejected" this bug) expect a user who is confronted with an updated manager that first suggests updates and then fails downloading them (for days!) to proceed??