Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> Figured that
> debian hadn't reported any problems, and they're in the same situation,
> it should also build here. Obviously not.
They aren't in the same situation because they uploaded 2.24.0.1 (which contains
the fix for this issue), so it built fine and got rid of the libgdl-gnome
dependency. You uploaded 2.4.2 instead, so obviously it's not the same.
> I also figured that I'd find out very quickly if it didn't build -
What about if it built fine but it was bogus? You would miss that.
Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> Figured that
> debian hadn't reported any problems, and they're in the same situation,
> it should also build here. Obviously not.
They aren't in the same situation because they uploaded 2.24.0.1 (which contains
the fix for this issue), so it built fine and got rid of the libgdl-gnome
dependency. You uploaded 2.4.2 instead, so obviously it's not the same.
> I also figured that I'd find out very quickly if it didn't build -
What about if it built fine but it was bogus? You would miss that.