I have a ubuntu 10.04 on a MBP 4,1 and the wireless randomly (continuously) loses connection with a wpa2 connection.
I've download these 3 files. Installing one of the libs works, but gdebi crashes on the libssl that you've linked to:
root$ gdebi libssl0.9.8_0.9.8o-1_amd64.deb
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Building data structures... Done
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/gdebi", line 83, in <module>
if not debi.open(args[0]):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/GDebi/GDebiCli.py", line 86, in open
if not self._deb.checkDeb():
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/GDebi/DebPackage.py", line 368, in checkDeb
if not self.checkBreaksExistingPackages():
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/GDebi/DebPackage.py", line 283, in checkBreaksExistingPackages
'depversion' : dep.version}
TypeError: not enough arguments for format string
root$
Is this because of the strange naming convention "o-1"?
The size and the MD5 checksum are the same as mentioned by Debian.
Commenting on #22 by Kilian Valkhof:
I have a ubuntu 10.04 on a MBP 4,1 and the wireless randomly (continuously) loses connection with a wpa2 connection.
I've download these 3 files. Installing one of the libs works, but gdebi crashes on the libssl that you've linked to:
root$ gdebi libssl0. 9.8_0.9. 8o-1_amd64. deb python2. 6/dist- packages/ GDebi/GDebiCli. py", line 86, in open checkDeb( ): python2. 6/dist- packages/ GDebi/DebPackag e.py", line 368, in checkDeb sExistingPackag es(): python2. 6/dist- packages/ GDebi/DebPackag e.py", line 283, in checkBreaksExis tingPackages
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Building data structures... Done
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/gdebi", line 83, in <module>
if not debi.open(args[0]):
File "/usr/lib/
if not self._deb.
File "/usr/lib/
if not self.checkBreak
File "/usr/lib/
'depversion' : dep.version}
TypeError: not enough arguments for format string
root$
Is this because of the strange naming convention "o-1"?
The size and the MD5 checksum are the same as mentioned by Debian.