kripkenstein wrote:
>
> On the other hand, if indeed the LSB mandates that "sh" be POSIX-
> compliant, and not bash, then I feel I must support the Ubuntu decision
> to use dash.
Also, from the LSB main page at http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/LSB:
"The LSB offers a cost-effective way for application vendors to target
multiple Linux distributions while building only one software package."
In essence, it says that if your app runs on a LSB 3.1 compliant system,
then it will run on LSB 3.2, 4.0, etc. The use of dash might interfere
with that concept.
kripkenstein wrote:
>
> On the other hand, if indeed the LSB mandates that "sh" be POSIX-
> compliant, and not bash, then I feel I must support the Ubuntu decision
> to use dash.
Ubuntu 6.06 is LSB compliant with bash.
http:// www.linux- foundation. org/en/ Products
Also, from the LSB main page at www.linux- foundation. org/en/ LSB:
http://
"The LSB offers a cost-effective way for application vendors to target
multiple Linux distributions while building only one software package."
This too is an interesting read: www.linux- foundation. org/en/ Application_ Compatibility
http://
In essence, it says that if your app runs on a LSB 3.1 compliant system,
then it will run on LSB 3.2, 4.0, etc. The use of dash might interfere
with that concept.