Ubuntu
dnsmasq package

  1. Bug #1726017
  2. Comment #1

Comment 1 for bug 1726017

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Hi Martin,
thanks for your great pre-analysis.
I agree to the general issue and the changes are small enough to review although the context it implies is a lot.

Also we need to be clear that this has two stages of not-correct:
2.76: 4ace25c5d6: Treat REFUSED (not SERVFAIL) as an unsuccessful upstream response
2.77: 68f6312d4b: Stop treating SERVFAIL as a successful response from upstream servers.

So:
- Xenial is lacking both
- Zesty is lacking the second
- Artful is good

Since I rarely patch dsnsmasq I wanted to ask for a check before going to an SRU with that.
I provided a ppa at [1] with test builds for Xenial and Zesty.

If you could try those out that would be very kind.

[1]: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3003