* Matthew Nuzum:
> Well, it's not the pages the community creates that we're necessarily
> worried about... but that being said, the doc team has a QA process to
> ensure the best stuff (accurate, easy to read) is more prominent than
> stuff that hasn't been tested.
Well, it doesn't have that process, that's the whole trouble. I don't
think this search code should go active before there is one. We've had a
lot of trouble recently with help wiki pages being erroneous or
unreliable and causing difficulty due to being "on the ubuntu.com"
domain, and we shouldn't make this worse by landing search code that
makes the pages visible from the main website, *UNTIL* we have
implemented such a good QA process
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpWikiQualityAssurance)
Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Matthew Nuzum:
> Well, it's not the pages the community creates that we're necessarily
> worried about... but that being said, the doc team has a QA process to
> ensure the best stuff (accurate, easy to read) is more prominent than
> stuff that hasn't been tested.
Well, it doesn't have that process, that's the whole trouble. I don't /wiki.ubuntu. com/HelpWikiQua lityAssurance)
think this search code should go active before there is one. We've had a
lot of trouble recently with help wiki pages being erroneous or
unreliable and causing difficulty due to being "on the ubuntu.com"
domain, and we shouldn't make this worse by landing search code that
makes the pages visible from the main website, *UNTIL* we have
implemented such a good QA process
(https:/
Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
F0w5rBv8RAjqlAJ sFFtHLvLN9C50ba RuBCCRTKywNkACf azcl EmQE30yDyYs=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iD8DBQFFhxALtSa
unGk6UowFm9+
=ecGv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----