I had thought about this after the bug submission.
But then IMHO the other emacs packages also should be changed. I mean the whole point of groups in /etc/alternatives is to avoid:
1. having to discover which are all files affected;
2. making repeated calls to 'enforce consistency'|'avoid breakage'.
I use emacsclient *all* the time (and knew about the emacs version incompatibility) , and I didn't even bother checking if there was a /etc/alternatives for it.
I had thought about this after the bug submission.
But then IMHO the other emacs packages also should be changed. I mean the whole point of groups in /etc/alternatives is to avoid:
1. having to discover which are all files affected;
2. making repeated calls to 'enforce consistency'|'avoid breakage'.
I use emacsclient *all* the time (and knew about the emacs version incompatibility) , and I didn't even bother checking if there was a /etc/alternatives for it.