Steve Langasek wrote:
> the other bugs are not the same as this one. This was due to the
> firefox wrapper looking in the wrong directory; the others are due to
> the wrapper assuming that $0 is a valid binary name, which breaks for a
> number of symlinks. Closing this bug again, retargeting the other for
> ubuntu-8.10 since this is too late for beta.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
>
>
All these bugs are related to missing symlinks or broken symlinks. When
this bug was fixed (running abrowser/firefox working) see changelog
above. now abrowser-3.0/firefox-3.0 dont work, how do you explain this
being different? you think one fix didnt break another?
Steve Langasek wrote: 3.0/firefox- 3.0 dont work, how do you explain this
> the other bugs are not the same as this one. This was due to the
> firefox wrapper looking in the wrong directory; the others are due to
> the wrapper assuming that $0 is a valid binary name, which breaks for a
> number of symlinks. Closing this bug again, retargeting the other for
> ubuntu-8.10 since this is too late for beta.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu Intrepid)
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
>
>
All these bugs are related to missing symlinks or broken symlinks. When
this bug was fixed (running abrowser/firefox working) see changelog
above. now abrowser-
being different? you think one fix didnt break another?
--
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https:/ /launchpad. net/~gnomefreak /wiki.ubuntu. com/JohnVivirit o
https:/
Linux User# 414246