Come again? If fuse-utils brings the rule that creates permissions, then shouldn't a permission problem w/ /dev/fuse be filed against the package fuse-utils comes from? sshfs already requires fuse-utils, so where exactly is the wrong dependancy?
Come again? If fuse-utils brings the rule that creates permissions, then shouldn't a permission problem w/ /dev/fuse be filed against the package fuse-utils comes from? sshfs already requires fuse-utils, so where exactly is the wrong dependancy?