seb128: the patch was from GTK upstream, based on Debian's patch from Loic Minier:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gnome/desktop/unstable/gtk+2.0/debian/patches/?rev=8444&sc=0
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gnome/desktop/unstable/gtk+2.0/debian/patches/030_CVE-2007-0010_error-handling-in-pixbuf-loaders.patch?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
RedHat's bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218932
While the GTK bug seems to be the same code path, the commits that fixed it don't seem to be associated with any particular bug:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/trunk/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-loader.c?rev=17165&view=log
seb128: the patch was from GTK upstream, based on Debian's patch from Loic Minier:
http:// svn.debian. org/wsvn/ pkg-gnome/ desktop/ unstable/ gtk+2.0/ debian/ patches/ ?rev=8444& sc=0
http:// svn.debian. org/wsvn/ pkg-gnome/ desktop/ unstable/ gtk+2.0/ debian/ patches/ 030_CVE- 2007-0010_ error-handling- in-pixbuf- loaders. patch?op= file&rev= 0&sc=0
RedHat's bug:
https:/ /bugzilla. redhat. com/bugzilla/ show_bug. cgi?id= 218932
While the GTK bug seems to be the same code path, the commits that fixed it don't seem to be associated with any particular bug:
http:// svn.gnome. org/viewcvs/ gtk%2B/ trunk/gdk- pixbuf/ gdk-pixbuf- loader. c?rev=17165& view=log