I changed my mind on the package version ...
I think you meant the ~jmarsden1 is OK for my PPA, but not for a debdiff here :)
Here is a debdiff to hardinfo-0.5.1-1.1ububntu4 for oneiric.
Since Debian has hardinfo and LXDE too, and so has the same issue, officially I should probably create 0.5.1-2 and then look for a DD mentor to get it into Debian unstable, and then request a sync?? I don't see anything in the recent Ubuntu-only packaging changes to hardinfo that looks truly Ubuntu-specific -- am I right? Shouldn't they all be put into a 0.5.1-2 package for Debian. so Ubuntu does not have to maintain a difference from Debian?
I changed my mind on the package version ...
I think you meant the ~jmarsden1 is OK for my PPA, but not for a debdiff here :)
Here is a debdiff to hardinfo- 0.5.1-1. 1ububntu4 for oneiric.
Since Debian has hardinfo and LXDE too, and so has the same issue, officially I should probably create 0.5.1-2 and then look for a DD mentor to get it into Debian unstable, and then request a sync?? I don't see anything in the recent Ubuntu-only packaging changes to hardinfo that looks truly Ubuntu-specific -- am I right? Shouldn't they all be put into a 0.5.1-2 package for Debian. so Ubuntu does not have to maintain a difference from Debian?