Comment 11 for bug 10644

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:09:17 -0500
From: Mark Johnson <email address hidden>
To: Junichi Uekawa <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: LDP docbook-depending packages

Hi Junichi,

Thanks for the heads-up on this. I also need to update
docbook-stylesheets in the next couple of days, so I will get a
chance to look into this in some detail.

Wish I could offer more, but I'm not currently on a debian machine...

'Sounds like we may need to poke the upstream maintainer (which I'll
do) to see what the long-term plan is for the ldp-stylesheets. It'd
be nice to minimize the changes we need to make for the
ldp-stylesheets to work properly on Debian.

Wednesday I'll post what I've learned.

Cheers,
Mark

To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>,

Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I've just noticed that LDP docbook stylesheets have been
> massively redone.
>
> There are two points:
>
> symlinks aren't going to be installed by dpkg if it's been a directory before
> (i.e. your compatibility symlinks aren't installed when upgraded,
> it needs to be done in postinst)
>
> filenames are dramatically different.
> Thus, I have to rewrite my xsl stylesheets for
> wysihtml
> pbuilder
> update-cluster
> whatever else.
> -- is there anything else that is affected by this change?
>
>
> regards,
> junichi
>
>