ehm, I don't think that we should fall back into the old OOo habit as
"this doesn't work in our build using internal libs, thus it's NOTOURBUG"
There's system-libs, you know, and we DO NOT PATCH the password things. (at least not in 3.5.0 rc3, where this was also reported for, see http://bugs.debian.org/659733.
ehm, I don't think that we should fall back into the old OOo habit as
"this doesn't work in our build using internal libs, thus it's NOTOURBUG"
There's system-libs, you know, and we DO NOT PATCH the password things. (at least not in 3.5.0 rc3, where this was also reported for, see http:// bugs.debian. org/659733.
"plain" source uses nss-3.12. 8-with- nspr-4. 8.6 whereas Debian has with.ckbi. 1.88-1 | sid | amd64, armel, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, with.ckbi. 1.88-1+ b1 | sid | armhf
libnspr4-0d | 4.9~beta5-2 | sid | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
+s390, s390x, sparc
libnss3-1d | 3.13.1.
+s390x, sparc
libnss3-1d | 3.13.1.
Some nss incompatibility? (Interestingly, the password unittest *succeeds*)