Ubuntu
librmagick-ruby package

  1. Bug #1299
  2. Comment #7

Comment 7 for bug 1299

Revision history for this message
unnu (norman-timmler) wrote :

I agree with Manfred. This should be fixed. I'd do it, but I have no experience building deb packages.

You can use the gem version from RubyForge, but using a gem for a package that exists in Ubuntu is not the preferred way.

At last at costs me about two hours to figure out the bug and finally install the gem version. This could be avoided.