Comment 25 for bug 1633207
Revision history for this message
| Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) wrote | #25 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
Unfortunately upstream response is super slow on this.
I think the patch is right and therefore I'm willing to put it into zesty as being a dev release in development.
That will also give us more coverage if there is anything we might have missed.
That said pushed it to Zesty now the way it was tested.by me and the reporter.
Since it is not an issue for Xenial there is not SRU need there but for Yakkety I'd only consider an SRU once upstream discussion settled and accepted it.
That said @IBM - if you want to request an SRU on this into Yakkety I'd ask you to join the upstream discussion on libvirt to give it some weight by a third party pushing for it.