Comment 6 for bug 2028888

Revision history for this message
Ɓukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

...I think we need a better way of dealing with this. Since what I did right now is make sure that the livefs and the 'FDE target' model have the same set of snaps. But apparently the set of snaps we install on the canary target are... limited?
This warrants figuring a better way of dealing with snaps. Adding new snaps to the model assertion is problematic, requires a signing round and updates to livecd-rootfs. This is suboptimal. I think we need to somehow make the livefs layer use the seeded snaps that we basically 'rip out' to the classic layer right now.

I don't have the brain power to figure that out right now. Maybe mwhudson would have an idea for this already?