Quoting Clint Byrum (<email address hidden>):
> Excerpts from Serge Hallyn's message of Tue Jul 19 12:05:52 UTC 2011:
> > The seems reasonable - do you think it would be safe to say that if the
> > argument starts with / it is a path, and, if not, then it is a username?
>
> What about
>
> ./foo
>
>
> ?
"Don't do that."
But that's why I asked. If you prefer we can add a new switch for
path bindmounting (as opposed to user binding).
Quoting Clint Byrum (<email address hidden>):
> Excerpts from Serge Hallyn's message of Tue Jul 19 12:05:52 UTC 2011:
> > The seems reasonable - do you think it would be safe to say that if the
> > argument starts with / it is a path, and, if not, then it is a username?
>
> What about
>
> ./foo
>
>
> ?
"Don't do that."
But that's why I asked. If you prefer we can add a new switch for
path bindmounting (as opposed to user binding).
-serge