On Sun, 29.05.2005 at 17:06:32 +0200, Torsten Landschoff <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:11:48PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD,
> > but breaking down completely on Debian "almost" sarge.
> Interesting. Which OpenLDAP version are you using?
that's openldap-server-2.2.23 (but I had severe problems getting it to
run properly using bdb).
> Sucky.
You name it :-/
Time to get another LDAP server software package...
> Hmm, good question. It shouldn't be too hard to just build the new
> upstream version but I wonder if our release manager would really like
> this.
That's exactly what I thought. Also, none of the bugs listed really
spring to my mind as being the solution of any of the problems
mentioned in this bug.
Hi Torsten,
On Sun, 29.05.2005 at 17:06:32 +0200, Torsten Landschoff <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:11:48PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD,
> > but breaking down completely on Debian "almost" sarge.
> Interesting. Which OpenLDAP version are you using?
that's openldap- server- 2.2.23 (but I had severe problems getting it to
run properly using bdb).
> Sucky.
You name it :-/
Time to get another LDAP server software package...
> Hmm, good question. It shouldn't be too hard to just build the new
> upstream version but I wonder if our release manager would really like
> this.
That's exactly what I thought. Also, none of the bugs listed really
spring to my mind as being the solution of any of the problems
mentioned in this bug.
> Look here: svn.debian. org/wsvn/ pkg-openldap/ openldap/ debian/
> http://
Ok, thank you!
(I thought of having this for *all* Debian packages because the problem
arises frequently, imho).
Best,
--Toni++