Comment 14 for bug 426360

Revision history for this message
Dirk Eddelbuettel (edd) wrote : Re: [Bug 426360] Re: [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever

On 25 September 2009 at 22:35, Colin Watson wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:14:19PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 25 September 2009 at 21:55, Colin Watson wrote:
| > | Dirk, do you have a package somewhere that fixes this? Your comments
| > | above inclined me to think that you did, but I don't know where to look.
| >
| > Sorry -- didn't publicize that all that well. It is in the 'revor' PPA:
| >
| > https://launchpad.net/~revor/+archive/ppa
| >
| > | I'd be happy to guide that into Karmic, or to simply apply the fix given
| > | by spaetz if you say the word.
| >
| > It should already be in Karmic. I tend to do the package work, Scott R does
| > the uploads and Scott K approves them.
|
| It's not yet in Karmic; that's why I asked. :-) (It's not in any
| approval queue either, as far as I can see.)

Ahh. Isaac had checked the Alpha builds and noticed that too.

| You left debian/changelog~ and debian/Rprofile.site~ lying around in the
| diff - presumably unintentional? I removed it, and uploaded your package

Yes, my source-only build invocation must have missed the pre-clean switch.

| otherwise unmodified except for changelog updates. I'd like to get this
| fixed for the 9.10 beta, hence the rush - Scott R, I hope I'm not
| stepping on your toes.

Great, we appreciate the effort of getting it into the 9.10 beta! It should
be there.

| Although I didn't change it for this upload since I wanted to discuss it
| with you, I think that for Karmic it would be a good idea to put the
| dependencies back the way they were before 2.9.2-2ubuntu1~ppa2, even if
| they need to stay otherwise in your PPA; do you disagree? In particular,
| if the dpkg dependencies are left the way they are at the moment then it
| will be possible for partial upgrades to go wrong, AFAICS. I'd rather
| give correct dependencies in Karmic precedence over installability on
| Jaunty, at least for packages in the main archive.

Concretely, we are talking about
 - support for libreadline-dev (to get libreadline6)
 - support for dpkg triggers (hence the dpkg >= requirement)

I agree. My short-term convenience should not matter. I can always rebuild on
Jaunty.

So that would mean another ~ppa$X upload, right?

Dirk, out of town at the kid's soccer tournament but with ssh access

| Thanks,
|
| --
| Colin Watson [<email address hidden>]
|
| --
| [PATCH] r-base suppresses ALL error messages forever
| https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426360
| You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
| of the bug.

--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.