On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 17:43 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Touset:
>=20
> > I'd like to second that. Having javahl automatically built would be
> > nice. However, it seems that javahl cannot be built with kaffe; the Sun
> > j2sdk is required, instead.
>=20
> This implies that Subversion would have to move to contrib, which is
> unacceptable (IMHO).
Is it possible that a patch could be written to allow javahl to be built
with kaffe?
--=20
Stephen Touset <email address hidden>
Information Infrastructure Engineer
O - (678) 483-4562, Ext. 122
M - (404) 234-5243
--=-5CbdIa9h7A2KgGvfrQUi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Message-Id: <1104166604. 4541.0. camel@localhost >
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:56:44 -0500
From: Stephen Touset <email address hidden>
To: Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#271125: subversion: javahl library
--=-5CbdIa9h7A2 KgGvfrQUi Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-
On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 17:43 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Stephen Touset:
>=20
> > I'd like to second that. Having javahl automatically built would be
> > nice. However, it seems that javahl cannot be built with kaffe; the Sun
> > j2sdk is required, instead.
>=20
> This implies that Subversion would have to move to contrib, which is
> unacceptable (IMHO).
Is it possible that a patch could be written to allow javahl to be built
with kaffe?
--=20
Stephen Touset <email address hidden>
Information Infrastructure Engineer
O - (678) 483-4562, Ext. 122
M - (404) 234-5243
--=-5CbdIa9h7A2 KgGvfrQUi pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Type: application/
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
fMdKwQeHvYRAnZ1 AJ4q8n7VhBqzE6c UJelkETNRNo7DQg CePEI2 G5fa62WI=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBB0D7L+
DOERq9wYWnZU26R
=Vxo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-5CbdIa9h7A2 KgGvfrQUi- -