Ubuntu
sugar-0.88 package

  1. Bug #617813
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 617813

Revision history for this message
Jani Monoses (jani) wrote :

Hello Dipankar,
do you know why there's no activity on this issue in upstream trac?
I also think the patch should be minimal and only contain the actual fix, without any cleanup work as the first and last hunks contain. This way it is easier to review and lowers the chances of conflicts if the code around has changed.
Can you please ping upstream with an updated patch?
Also do you know why Ubuntu carries both sugar-0.88 and sugar-0.90 ?
thanks
Jani