Comment 4 for bug 1431107
Revision history for this message
| Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote Re: ordering cycles with early boot images on lvm2.service | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Ah, thanks for the journal. That shows that early boot is completely messed up due to dependency cycles. This also affected systemd-
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on sysinit.
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on systemd-
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on local-fs.
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on lvm2.service/start
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on basic.target/start
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Breaking ordering cycle by deleting job systemd-
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Job systemd-
But the shortest one is
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on sysinit.
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on local-fs.
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on lvm2.service/start
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Found dependency on basic.target/start
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Breaking ordering cycle by deleting job local-fs.
Mar 12 05:56:32 mamarley-laptop systemd[1]: Job local-fs.
Out of that I blame lvm2.service. That's shipped by default, but for some reason on your system it causes trouble. Can you please give me the output of
systemctl show --no-pager -p Requires,
?