Comment 59 for bug 120281

> What is the reason to restore flowed text wrapping of the saved mail if one
> is switched wrapping off?

Well, like I said: wrap=0 is itself a bit of a hack. The behavior is distinct from f=f, and some people may be using wrap=0 for that specific behavior. I can't say if there's a case where someone wants f=f support *and* wrap=0, but f=f changes more than just wrapping.

I don't use wrap=0, so I don't really mind if you put the check in; I'm just not convinced that the check doesn't break something for someone else who might be using wrap=0. Further, I don't see that executing the line-break removal for the wrap=0 case prevents this bug from being fixed.

This is a nice complement to bug 125928. If only the trunk didn't have the loathsome display of body text in the thread pane, I'd be eagerly anticipating downloading a version with these bugs fixed; but Alas! The trunk is not useable due to that misfeature. :/